<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Equity Report &#8212; Tired of Waiting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://madisonamps.org/2009/11/27/equity-report-tired-of-waiting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://madisonamps.org/2009/11/27/equity-report-tired-of-waiting/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 08:45:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas J. Mertz</title>
		<link>http://madisonamps.org/2009/11/27/equity-report-tired-of-waiting/#comment-2726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas J. Mertz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 03:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://madisonamps.org/?p=3941#comment-2726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve been told that the required Equity Report information will be included in a broader January report.  I&#039;m glad something is happening and appreciate those on and off the Board who have pushed.

This is very late for an annual report (it will be 21 months since the policy was enacted) and not ideal.  If the intent was to have at least one meeting  a year where the focus was on equity measures, placing this in a larger report will not achieve this goal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been told that the required Equity Report information will be included in a broader January report.  I&#8217;m glad something is happening and appreciate those on and off the Board who have pushed.</p>
<p>This is very late for an annual report (it will be 21 months since the policy was enacted) and not ideal.  If the intent was to have at least one meeting  a year where the focus was on equity measures, placing this in a larger report will not achieve this goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

