Category Archives: Budget

Young Lobbyists

2

I’ve been too busy to post a follow up on the September 18th visit to the Capitol to advocate for state school finance reform. Sorry for the delay.

Let me start by thanking all those who participated. We had a good crowd, about thirty total in three groups, most under age twelve. As you can imagine it was a bit chaotic, but the energy was great. Next time we’ll try to be better organized…there will be next time and a time after that and beyond.

The kids were great and I loved the signs they brought. The parents were great too. I was impressed by how well informed their comments and questions were and how they pushed the legislators and staff to get past the canned talking points.

When I was thinking about it later it came to me that one of the things I like about Madison is that many people believe that they can make a difference, that they can create positive change. That was the spirit I saw in our group and the lesson I saw our children learning. How wonderful.

On one hand we know that a handful of parents and children is not going to undo the damage done by the $366,674 that Wisconsin Manufactures and Commerce spent lobbying from January to June of 2007. On the other hand we know that if we refuse to be ignored, we can do some good. It is the William Lloyd GarrisonI will be heard” attitude. Keep it up!

We will be doing more of this, stay tuned for details. For now I want ask for a couple more things. First, for those who joined us at the Capitol a quick note to the offices you visited — thanking them for their time and reiterating the purpose of our effort — would be a good idea. All the legislators are listed here. The notes, letters and calls from those who couldn’t make it are always good too. I would especially push Brett Davis on the timeline of his proposal and for a better, less political explanation of why he refuses to give the Pope-Roberts resolution a hearing. The second request has to do with the Wisconsin Alliance for Excellent Schools (disclosure, I’m a Board member of WAES). WAES has been doing the best work on state education finance reform for years. Recently it became clear that we will not be able to depend on foundation funding in the future and would need to find an alternate way to keep going. We are in the midst of transitioning to a dues structure. On October 1, Tom Beebe (of WAES) will be doing a presentation to the MMSD Board of Education Communications Committee, explaining the changes and beginning the process of asking that our district become a dues paying partner. There will be public comment that evening and your support would be appreciated.

Thanks to all again, especially those who got this started and the kids.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Budget, Local News, Pope-Roberts/Breske Resolution, School Finance, Take Action

Quote of the Day

Crime aside, what is the second biggest issue you think Madison is facing?

I would imagine that after dealing with poverty and crime, working with the state to developing a fair tax structure to support public education

Paul Soglin

I’d only add that these are far from unrelated issues.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Budget, Local News, Quote of the Day, School Finance

School Funding Action: Capitol Visit 9/18

Tuesday September 18th is an in-service day for MMSD and a group of parents have decided to take this opportunity to bring their children to the Capitol to remind our elected officials of the need to do a better job funding education.

The details and some notes about talking points below:

First, the simple details (flier here):

  • Meet at the State entrance 10:00 AM, 9/18.
  • Senators Risser and Robson, Representatives Pocan, Pope Roberts and Berceau have all been contacted and are expecting us. The legislature will convene at 11:00, the elected officials have full schedules and we may end up speaking to staff in one or more of the offices.
  • MMSD is also represented by Senators Erpenbach and Miller and Representatives Travis, Black and Parsi. We will try to contact them in advance.
  • It has been suggested that the Chairs of the Assembly Education Committee (Brett Davis) and the Assembly Education Reform Committee (Donald Pridemore) also get visits (more on that below).
  • Under the circumstances, I think it would be a good idea to bring short, personal letters that we can leave with the legislators or their staffs (letters from kids would be great! My 12-year-old son is writing one letter addressed to “Senators and Representatives” and we will bring multiple copies).
  • With the tight time frame we will probably divide up (and conquer!).
  • Bringing signs would be good too (not allowed in chambers, but OK in hallways).

    That should take care of the who, where and when. The what got very complicated these last few days. I’m going to try to make this as simple as possible but need to give some background (skip down to the talking points at the end if you like).

    The state finance system is a mess, a big mess. The Wisconsin Legislature is in the middle of negotiations on the biennial budget but none of the proposals on the table address the fundamental problems of the school finance system, the big mess. However, except for some relatively small differences as of Thursday September 13, the parties all back different versions of something very much like the best proposal anyone put forth. Points of agreement include items like the standard annual revenue limit increases, increased SAGE funding and special education aid; all of which would help Madison’s schools and many other districts. This would be good news except for the fact that the GOP want this considered separate from the budget negotiations and the Democrats don’t want to separate anything.

    So all the parties have essentially agreed on the structure and level of school funding, but conflict remains. This may change by Tuesday when the Assembly is scheduled to take up their k-12 bill.

    I don’t think it is a good idea for advocates of school finance reform to take sides in this conflict, but use your own judgment. What I do think we all should do is thank the Legislators of all a parties for supporting in one form or another the good things this budget will provide for the schools and continue to push for systematic reform, to demand that they do better.

    The structural gap between allowed revenues and expenses in the current system, even under the best-case scenario with this budget cycle, will continue to create annual cuts in programming and services of about 1.5%. Special education aid from the state will still only cover about 30% of the costs and bilingual reimbursements from the state will cover less than 12% of the costs. Almost all schools and districts that take advantage of the proven SAGE class size reductions will have to find cuts elsewhere to pay for this wonderful but underfunded program. Over 100 districts have held referenda in the last year. Districts with declining enrollments and rising enrollments face different but equally destructive shortfalls under the current system. This system, the system the budget won’t touch, wreaks havoc in the biggest cities, the small towns, the rural districts, the North woods… Throughout the state educators and students find themselves struggling each year to do more with less.

    Representative Sondy Pope Roberts has introduced a Joint Resolution (with 60 co-sponsors) calling for the Legislature to create a new system with funding levels based on the real costs of education, sufficient state resources for districts to meet mandates and enough flexibility to address the diverse needs of districts in the state. This is the best shot to move real reform forward this session. A hearing by the Senate Education Committee has been scheduled for November 15th. The Assembly Education and Education Reform Committee Chairs have not agreed to schedule hearings.

    Based on the above, these are my suggested talking points:

    Thank you for supporting the band-aid relief in this budget cycle.
    o Revenue limit increases
    o SAGE funding increases
    o Special Education funding increases

    The system remains broken
    o Structural gap between revenue limits and costs
    o Underfunded mandates and programs
    o Diverse needs inadequately addressed
    o Schools and children are struggling
    o Wisconsin cannot remain competitive if this continues

    Real reform needed

    Pope-Roberts Resolution will move real reform forward

    Support the resolution

    More information links:

    WisPolitics Budget Blog (best source for both background and up to the minute info)

    MMSD Budget Info

    Wisconsin Alliance for Excellent Schools

    Carol Carstensen’s brief explanation of the state school finance system

    Past Present and Future MMSD Budget Cuts

    Thomas J. Mertz

  • Leave a comment

    Filed under AMPS, Budget, Local News, Pope-Roberts/Breske Resolution, School Finance, Take Action

    Who is the Winner? (Quote of the Day)

    “Basically, Republicans agreed to the education funding levels proposed by Democrats,” Schultz said. “The record high $9.5 billion in state aid for K-12 education will make property taxpayers the big winner, especially if the final agreement includes a levy limit that protects property taxpayers.”

    State Senator Dale Schultz

    Wouldn’t be nice if we had a school finance system where the children were the “big winner[s]”?

    Thomas J. Mertz

    Leave a comment

    Filed under AMPS, Budget, Quote of the Day, School Finance

    Quotes of the Day (We are Not Alone #17)

    Chetek School District begins considering an operating referendum.

    “What we heard loud and clear from the community was that we want everything and more for our kids…Obviously, with our budget dwindling, we’re going to have to do something to meet the expectations of the community.”

    Genie Jennings, President Chetek School District, Board of Education

    “I think we have to do it. It’s not a debatable issue. The question is, ‘Is it going to be a community-wide effort with help from the board?’…I think the community will pay for what they perceive as quality, performance and value,…Doing more with less may actually happen, but to provide good services frugally, and to be competitive, we’re going to have to create more opportunities for students. That is the real focus.”

    Ken Jost, Member Chetek School District, Board of Education

    Thomas J. Mertz

    Leave a comment

    Filed under AMPS, Budget, Quote of the Day, Referenda, School Finance, We Are Not Alone

    We are Not Alone #16

    The woes associated with the lack of action on the state budget and the fears created by the draconian GOP positions are not confined to MMSD.

    This from the Prairie Farm School District:

    The political wrangling has more immediate consequences, however. School districts don’t know how much state aid they will receive for their 2007-2008 budget cycles, and counties are uncertain how much in shared revenues they can count on from the state, either.

    Statutes provide a guarantee that, while waiting for an official budget to be adopted, these institutions can expect to continue receiving the same compensation levels that they had enjoyed the year before. But some say that provision isn’t a cure-all.

    Prairie Farm School District Superintendent Don Hauck said that his district has been affected by the bogged-down state budget. Despite a successful referendum last spring, some planned school projects, such as upgrading HVAC systems, have been placed on hold until more solid figures on 2008 state aid are available.

    Hauck also noted that schools will still receive 2007 state aid levels while the 2008 budget is hammered out, but the status quo may be insufficient, since operating costs continue to rise. If more state aid for schools doesn’t materialize, then the difference might have to be made up through increased property taxes.

    Thomas J. Mertz

    Leave a comment

    Filed under AMPS, Budget, School Finance, We Are Not Alone

    Why the State Budget Matters to All of Us

    From the Capital Times

    But school district spokesman Joe Quick said several provisions in the Assembly Republican budget could still create shortfalls or other problems for Madison schools.

    Chief among those is funding for SAGE, the program that creates smaller class sizes for at-risk students. As part of a deal to allow the Milwaukee school choice program to expand, Doyle proposed increasing funding for the SAGE program by $250 per pupil. Assembly Republicans cut that money, Quick said, which would mean $716,000 less for Madison schools, Quick said.

    Another GOP proposal aimed at reducing health care costs in schools would hit even harder. The Republican budget would freeze the amount local schools could raise from property taxes at $200 per student, instead of the $264 allowed by current law, if districts adopt health care plans that are more expensive than the state’s insurance plan.

    That provision would force a $5 million cut because the district has already approved its contract with Madison teachers, Quick said.

    “We’ve got contracts in place. We can’t lay off people now” to recoup those losses, he said. “Any cuts that would have to be made would get pushed off until the 2008-09 budget.”

    This madness has to stop. Make your voices heard (info here)

    Thomas J. Mertz

    Leave a comment

    Filed under AMPS, Budget, Local News, School Finance, Take Action

    John Smart on the State Budget

    I’ve had the pleasure of working with John on Wisconsin Allaince for Excellent Schools matters. He get’s it right.

    Thomas J. Mertz

    “The Department of Public Instruction (DPI) set Friday, Sept. 28 as the deadline for getting a final 2007-09 state budget through the state Legislature in order for the department to have time to run the complicated equalization aid calculation and inform districts of their 2007-08 aid by Oct. 15 as required by statute. If the Legislature fails to meet that deadline, the DPI will have little choice but to use the 2006-07 equalization aid numbers.”

    The preceding is from today’s email to members from the Wisconsin Association of School Boards, and points up the serious problem that we’re facing in our schools due to the legislature’s utter failure to responsibly deal with our state’s budget.

    Today I also attended a meeting in Mosinee of the new steering committee for the Wisconsin Alliance for Excellent Schools, followed later by a joint meeting of the school boards of Park Falls and Butternut, which are negotiating a possible consolidation. Whenever the subject of the legislature and the budget came up, and believe me, it came up, it was met with hoots of derision!

    The following is my most recent commentary from THE-BEE, for your edification.

    John Smart

    Commentary by John Smart
    The Budget
    THE-BEE, Phillips WI
    Opinion Column
    Last updated: Thursday, September 06th, 2007 09:03:09 AM

    Definition: A budget is a description of a financial plan. It is a list of estimates of revenues to and expenditures by an agent for a stated period of time.

    We all have budgets. Most of us don’t write them down, but we know how much income we have and how much we can spend in order to not go into debt – too far, anyway. We plan for necessities like food, shelter and basic health care, and then determine what else we might be able to afford — like maybe a vacation trip or a new boat. And, if we do go into debt, to buy a house or a vehicle or whatever, we plan how we’re going to pay that debt off.

    Governments have budgets, too. In Wisconsin, as in most states, we have a biennial budget, a plan for two years, which means that every two years the governor proposes and the legislature disposes, often essentially writing their own version.

    But the governor of Wisconsin has a very powerful veto option, which allows him [or her] to alter the budget by deleting and/or rearranging language, so the budget can change again in the governor’s approval phase. [Many politicians noisily disapprove of this powerful veto option — usually the ones who are not in power!]

    Also, in most states and the federal government, the budget must be passed in a timely manner or the government simply grinds to a halt. In Wisconsin, however, we have a provision that allows the government to just continue on, following the old budget, while deliberations continue. And that’s what’s happening now.

    Gov. Jim Doyle presented his version of the budget to the Legislature in February, and the Joint Finance Committee of the Senate and the Assembly held public hearings and private deliberations and eventually passed their version in June. They sent that budget to the full Senate and Assembly for passage. The new budget for 2007 through 2009 was supposed to be passed by July 1st — but it wasn’t.

    As of now, Wisconsin is the only state in the nation that does not have a budget. [Illinois and California passed theirs recently, leaving us all alone.] We are becoming a national joke.

    The State Senate passed its version of the budget, built on the governor’s and the Joint Finance Committee’s proposals, and adding their own ideas. But then, the Assembly sailed off on its own course, passing a very different budget indeed. These two budgets have almost nothing in common. They seem to have come from two different states!

    So, they formed another committee to somehow blend these two into one workable budget that can then be passed by both bodies and returned to Gov. Doyle, who will work his own magic on it. One good point for us, up here in the Northwoods, is that two of our own, Senators Russ Decker [D-Weston] and Bob Jauch [D-Poplar], serve on this committee. For a change, we won’t be dictated to by the more populous parts of the state!

    But — in the meanwhile — our local schools and our great state university can’t finalize their own budgets because they don’t know what the state budget will eventually allow them. The same uncertainty is true for municipalities and other state entities.

    Assembly Republicans have suggested appropriations that would negatively impact our local school districts, that would starve the UW Law School into oblivion, that would cut state funding for the UW Extension, seriously affecting our excellent public radio and television services as well as other Extension programs like 4H.

    Healthy Wisconsin, the health care reform plan proposed by Senate Democrats, is under intense debate, with groups like Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce [against] and Citizen Action of Wisconsin [in favor] battling it out in competing public meetings around the state. This traveling circus includes a giant statue of a pig, bought and paid for by an out-of-state, right-leaning organization called Americans for Prosperity, that is carted around the state to protest what they see as gross expenditures.

    A Town Hall Meeting on Healthy Wisconsin will be held on Sept. 17 at the Taylor County Community Center on the fairgrounds in Medford starting at 6:00 p.m.. The special guest will be State Senator Kathleen Vinehout [D-Alma], one of the authors of the Healthy Wisconsin plan. Please come and learn more about the plan.

    Environmentalists are alarmed that the Assembly Republicans want to slash the state’s Knowles-Nelson Stewardship Fund, which buys up forest land that is being sold off, primarily by large timber interests, in order to preserve such land for recreational use by future generations.

    The Legislature’s Republicans are digging in their heels, however, and tell their constituencies that they are just trying to keep from raising taxes. But, of course, they tried to get sales tax relief for people who deal in gold bullion — doubtless a huge number of needy Wisconsinites. They also removed the governor’s proposed tax increases on cigarettes and the big oil companies.

    Wherever you stand on these issues, there is a reality here that should be addressed: the Democrats hold the upper hand. We have a Democratic governor and State Senate. Republicans control the Assembly, but only by a three vote margin. The budget will probably go the Democrats’ way no matter how long they drag it out.

    Clearly the Republican strategy is to talk loudly about cutting taxes and programs, which will appeal to their own conservative constituency. Perhaps this is a good long-term political plan, but it does little to advance the state’s immediate needs.

    Do we really want to abolish the UW Law School or public broadcasting? Do we really want sales tax relief for gold bullion investors and big oil companies? Don’t we really want good schools and health care for those who need it — and a workable budget in place?

    Remember, the fiscal year started on July 1st.

    John Smart lives in Park Falls, is a member of the Wisconsin Governor’s Commission on the United Nations, the UN Association of the USA and Citizens for Global Solutions. He was a Peace Corps volunteer in Uzbekistan from 1995 through 1998, serves on the Park Falls Board of Education and chairs the Democratic Party of Price County.

    Leave a comment

    Filed under AMPS, Budget, School Finance

    Two Legged Stool

    The Wisconsin school finance “system” is often called a “three legged stool,” with the legs being 2/3 funding from state revenues (1/3 from local and federal sources), the QEO to limit teacher contract costs and the revenue caps to limit local property taxes (note that this is mostly about tax issues and not about education).

    The Legislative Fiscal Bureau just released an analysis that shows 43.8% of the districts in Wisconsin receive less than 65% of their revenues from the state.

    Two legged stools are designed to fail. So is our school finance system.

    Thomas J. Mertz

    Leave a comment

    Filed under AMPS, Budget, Gimme Some Truth, Local News, School Finance

    Quote (paraphrase) of the Day

    From State Superintendent Elizabeth Burmaster’s “back to school” interview (more here).

    One thing the superintendent says schools need as soon as possible is a state budget. School districts have a sense of apprehension she says because they don’t know if allocated state aid will meet growing operational costs.

    Thomas J. Mertz

    Leave a comment

    Filed under AMPS, Budget, Local News, School Finance