Category Archives: Best Practices

Think Recent Test Scores Show Schools are Failing? Think Again!

Despite some recent media reports about declining student test scores, some with problematic methodologies, the author of this piece suggests such reporting has obscured some real successes and that we lose sight of the gains taking place in education.

Excerpt:

Average test scores, despite the play they get in the media, have very little meaning as measures of student achievement, because they can hide gains made by increasingly large minority populations. This is known as Simpson’s paradox, which is explained here. For example, the twelfth grade NAEP data for English language learners showed a slight increase in the last 15 years (though not by a statistically significant amount). ELL students, who tend to score lower, make up a much greater percentage of students today than in 1992, and thus have the effect of “bringing down” the average despite stable or improved performance.

As Michael Martin, a research analyst at the Arizona School Boards Association, has noted, today’s population of students are much harder to teach. Minority populations, English language learner populations, and populations of students from single-parent or foster homes have all increased. In addition, more students today are in college preparatory programs; many of the students who are today achieving lower scores would have, in past decades, been tracked into non-college preparatory classes such as vocational education.

Finally, Martin also notes that graduation rates for students of all races and backgrounds are significant higher today than in previous decades and are increasing. Lower twelfth grade test scores, he argues, are the result of our successes in keeping students in school who would otherwise have dropped out. We are looking at the wrong measures of success, he argues, and we are therefore drawing the wrong conclusions.

When we judge the achievements and failures of students based only on a few selected test scores, we lose sight of real measures of success in education and do ourselves and our children a disservice. If we want to grade our schools, we should do it based on figures that matter – graduation rates, preschool enrollment, or other real measurements of the quality of education schools are providing. In these areas, states around the country have seen marked improvement, and that is something worth talking about.

Robert Godfrey

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Best Practices, National News, No Child Left Behind

Think about it

The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer.
~Edward R. Murrow

posted by Janet Morrow

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Best Practices

Accountability and Common Sense

“There is a zero percent chance that we will ever reach a 100 percent target,” said Robert L. Linn, co-director of the National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing at UCLA. “But because the title of the law is so rhetorically brilliant, politicians are afraid to change this completely unrealistic standard. They don’t want to be accused of leaving some children behind.”

More here and here.

It is easy to talk about demanding that “all students” do this or that, but reality is much more complex. The No Child Left Behind act should serve as warning about the dangers of ill-concieved accountability rhetoric becoming ill-concieved accountability policies.

Much more on “accountability” here (disclosure, from a friend, Sherman Dorn).

Thomas J. Mertz

1 Comment

Filed under Accountability, AMPS, Best Practices, National News, No Child Left Behind

Study focuses on school achievement gap

“Despite decades of interventions and billions of dollars spent, a large gap in school achievement stubbornly persists between underprivileged children and their more advantaged peers.

With funding from the Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery seed grant program, UW–Madison scientists will now bring their collective expertise to bear on one important, but overlooked, cause of this troubling problem.” Announcement is here.

Robert Godfrey

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Best Practices, Local News

One of Madison’s Own

Kaleem Caire, a person with deep roots in Madison and an old friend has recently started The Next Generation Foundation an organization whose mission is to “To increase school participation and success rates of adolescent males of color, and prepare them to succeed in college preparatory high schools and higher education.” They are currently working only in the Washington DC area, but as Kaleem put it his “heart will always be on Fisher Street” and he would like to bring the programs to Madison.

The recent Isthmus story on “disconnected youth” highlights the need for the work Kaleem is doing. Kaleem’s background as a “semi-disconnected youth,” experience and connections in Madison make me believe that Next Generation could do much good here. We should all try to help him bring his work back where his heart remains. I’m going to.

Please, do take the time to check out what the Next Generation Foundation is doing.

TJM

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Best Practices, Local News

NY Times Article on Reading First and MMSD’s Reading Program

AMPS is committed to the 3 P’s: public support, proven practices and proper funding for public education. This post is focused on proven practices.

There’s been a lot of back-and-forth about whether MMSD made a wise choice in turning down a $2 million federal grant for the highly-prescriptive Reading First Program. This NY Times article today (March 9) goes in-depth both on some of the results Madison has seen using its balanced literacy approach (which is much more student-specific than Reading First) and presents more information on exactly why the district turned the money down.

I have no interest in resurrecting curriculum wars in MMSD, but thought the data on what Madison is seeing as a result of its strategies and how the district listened to their own reading teachers and specialists in deciding to proceed with their approach is worth reading.

Beth Swedeen

5 Comments

Filed under AMPS, Best Practices, Local News, National News, No Child Left Behind

“Food” for Thought…

When you plant lettuce, if it does not grow well, you don’t blame the lettuce. You look into the reasons it is not doing well. It may need fertilizer, or more water, or less sun. You never blame the lettuce. Yet if we have problems with our friends or our family, we blame the other person. But if we know how to take care of them, they will grow well, like lettuce. Blaming has no positive effect at all, nor does trying to persuade using reason and arguments. That is my experience. No blame, no reasoning, no argument, just understanding. If you understand, and you show that you understand, you can love, and the situation will change. –

~Thich Nhat Hanh~

Janet Morrow

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Best Practices

Bridging Differences

Two educators, Deborah Meier and Diane Ravitch, are starting an interesting dialogue on the Education Week blog, Bridging Differences. Meier approaches education from a more progressive point of view and Ravitch from a more conservative one. As their dialogue develops, I’m sure they will encapsulate much of the discussions we are having here in Madison about the future of our schools. Check it out here and check back often.

And while you are at it, you should read what both women have to say, in different pieces, on the role of teacher unions in education — Deborah Meier’s “On Unions and Education,” from the Winter 2004 issue of Dissent, and Diane Ravitch’s “Why Teacher Unions Are Good for Teachers and the Public,” in the Winter 2006-2007 issue of the AFT’s American Educator.

Robert Godfrey

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Best Practices, National News

Promising School Practices: How Many are a Part of YOUR School?

Author Thomas Armstrong, probably best known for his book Multiple Intelligences in the Classroom, has written a new book called, The Best Schools: How Human Development Research Should Inform Educational Practice. He draws from the work of Montessori, Piaget, Freud, Dewey, Elkind, Gardner and Reggio to talk about the most promising and exciting practices in today’s schools — and what needs to go. He has lists by age, which I thought others might find useful in looking at what MMSD is doing now and where it wants to go…

AGES 3-6:

Developmentally appropriate: open-ended play; short school day; nap time; informal learning all the time; parent involvement at school; moving and learning most of the time; careful documentation of children’s play and what they reveal about their world (play-based assessment); child-centered program; multi-sensory experiences; frequent opportunities for spontaneity and fun; letting children choose their own activities.

Inappropriate: long school day, instruction in formal academics; homework; long periods of seat work; standardized tests; teacher-centered program; scheduling “classes” into short time units; division of day into “courses”; creation of instructional objectives for children; requiring all children to engage in the same activities at the same time.

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Appropriate: classroom that opens to the real world (literally and figuratively); reading, writing and math in relationship to real-world discoveries; authentic learning materials that are part of the real world (internet, literature, art supplies,science tools); some explorations of the real world guided by teachers; learning based on encounters with the real world, resulting in ideas, insights, reflections, observations.

Inappropriate: artificial classroom environment; overemphasis on reading, writing and math; textbooks, worksheets, workbooks; scripted teaching programs; fact-based learning programs.

MIDDLE SCHOOLS

Appropriate: safe school climate, small learning communities; personal adult relationships; engaged learning; positive role models; metacognitive strategies integrated into all courses; expressive arts activities for ALL students; health and wellness focus; emotionally meaningful curriculum; student roles in decision making; honoring and respecting student voices; facilitating social and emotional growth.

Inappropriate: unsafe school climate; large, impersonal schools; impersonal adult relationships; fragmented curriculum; metacognitive strategies limited to math and reading; no significant arts program; no meaningful health/wellness program; emotionally flat learning experiences; teacher and administrator controlled learning environment; student voices not listened to or respected; total focus on academic learning to the neglect of social/emotional development.

HIGH SCHOOLS
Appropriate: Small learning communities; theme-based magnet/charter schools; career academics; internships; entrepreneurial enterprises; apprenticeships; democratic communities.

Inappropriate: Large, impersonal high schools; “shopping mall” high schools; tracking; too much time sitting in classrooms; excessive academic pressure; impersonal student-teacher relationships; zero-tolerance policies.

Ideas on how we can move even further toward appropriate practices in ALL MMSD schools?

— Beth Swedeen

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Best Practices

Two Educators Reflect on Eisen’s Essay

Interesting responses in Paul Soglin’s blog to a piece by Marc Eisen in a publication of the right wing supported WPRI.

Robert Godfrey

2 Comments

Filed under AMPS, Best Practices, Local News