Category Archives: Elections

Quotes of the Day — Accountability

19rothstein5151

The federal No Child Left Behind Act has succeeded in highlighting the poor math and reading skills of disadvantaged children. But on balance, the law has done more harm than good because it has terribly distorted the school curriculum. Modest modifications cannot correct this distortion. Designing a better accountability policy will take time. We cannot and should not abandon school accountability, but it’s time to go back to the drawing board to get accountability right…

Designing a new accountability system will take time and care, because the problems are daunting. Observations of student behavior are not as reliable as standardized tests of basic skills, so we will have to accept that it is better to imperfectly measure a broad set of outcomes than to perfectly measure a narrow set. We will have to resolve contradictory national convictions that schools should teach citizenship and character, but not inquire about students’ (and parents’) personal opinions. To avoid new distortions, we’ll need to make tough decisions about how to weight the measurement of the many goals of education.

Richard Rothstein, “Getting Accountability Right,” Education Week.

These quotes and the commentary were directed at NCLB reform, but I think they are also applicable to the MMSD Strategic Planning process that begins next week and want to note that Todd Price is the only candidate for State Superintendent of Public Instruction who is voicing similar ideas about the failings of NCLB and the need for more than adjustments.

Related at eduwonkette (and a hat tip); and from the Annenberg Institute, “Beyond Test Scores: Leading Indicators for Education” (many other great resources at the Annenberg site).

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under Accountability, Best Practices, Elections, National News, nclb, No Child Left Behind

One Contested Seat — Madison School Board

55066921

I had been thinking about a post asking and speculating why Madison would have two consecutive school board elections without contested seats (I’m still interested in the lack of candidates, may post on it later and would love to read your thoughts in the comments); instead I get to write about the contest between Board president Arlene Silveira and newcomer Donald Gors Jr.

If you follow school politics in Madison, you already know enough to have formed an impression of Arlene Silveira (mine is complicated and contradictory, I think she is solid, caring, I share many beliefs with her but also disagree on some things in both policy and governance style…).  Gors is a mystery.

A little Internet searching sheds some light.

In 2004, in the midst of a difficult budget season, Gors testified before the MMSD finance committee. I’m not sure what to make of what he said, so I’m just going to quote the minutes:

Don Gors, parent, stated that the district should be expanding services to children and the need for flexibility in meeting the needs of society, however, things could not be done in the same way. Suggested that the district stop late buses and cab rides. He asked that they not do what constituents think but involve the teachers more and change the delivery of services and make the community accountable.

Maybe it made more sense when you heard the whole thing?

Dors and his spouse also had a letter on Mathematics education published in the State Journal in 2005.  Again, I’m going to quote the entirety:

Children are confused

My three children attend Madison public schools in grade 10 at Memorial High School, and sixth and eighth grades at Jefferson Middle School. We have seen how the introduction of numerous elementary and middle school math programs have negatively impacted our children during these past 10 years.

We have noticed that if your child is in grades four, six, eight or 10 (the years our children are tested), that during the first two months of school our children are exposed to an explosion of different math challenges that seem to be all over the map. Our children come home confused and mad, and when we look at the math they are struggling to learn, there appears to be no fundamental building block for the learning of it. My wife and I have come to the conclusion our children are exposed to the variety of math challenges because they may be on the test.

Be careful when you hear the data being thrown around by our administrators and our Wisconsin DPI. We know when our children are struggling. If our kids can’t do the basic math of addition, subtraction, division, multiplication, fractions, decimals (without a calculator) and do four-step word problem-solving by the end of grade six your child needs help!

One size never, ever fits all. When will our educators take it as their failure to teach and not our children’s failure to learn?

I like the skepticism toward the test data, and the call not blame children for their lack of progress (although all students need to be encouraged to take charge of their educations) but the rest seems, well “confused.”

The last thing I’m going to share  a letter that Dors and his spouse sent to the County Board in June of 2008 (full County Board Minutes with letter here, letter extracted here).   It is too long to reproduce, but I do want to give the flavor with a relatively long excerpt (I do suggest reading the whole thing):

Dear, All Dane County Supervisors:

What happens when times get tough …. all the issues which have been given less attention start to come to the top.

(Land Purchases, RTA, Smoking Bans, Building Jails, Lack of Accountability Methods Over Safety -Security-Basic Needs!)

Just watch as a perceived good company goes bad…what causes it to go bad? Does it happen over night or is there signs that things are going south? Maybe that’s why people say follow the money…it has been learned that is true….in all Business and Government Operations!

South..Bad…Sour…Politics before Process, maybe this is the direction that some of this Counties Supervisors are allowing Dane County to be taken…

What I mean here is when times are good more and more things are not looked at or looked after because moral is up, perceived money is coming in and money is being spent but….then all of a sudden when things slow down the money has been over spent on things that are not center to it’s core business of operation…accounting faults are found and then what …whose left with the problem?

In business the first thing that goes are employees the last thing that happens is management is dismantled and then the business is shut down.

In government the first thing that happens is a request to increase Taxes surfaces. An attempt to remove the focus from what needs to be focused on. (What Dane County spending money on?). Past and Present!

Then some will try to bring others around to what’s important (Accountability, Responsibility) then all of a sudden a spin surfaces scaring others that Services will be diminished if Taxes are not increased.
Children will begin to suffer, those who you have made dependent on Government are made the main focus when the focus really should be on You, The Administration, A Public Accounting …where has the money gone, what has the money been spent on?

You see Government never looks at itself first, how Government is spending the money, is there a value for the majority when Government makes a decision on what to spend money on?

You get further and further away from asking yourself one question: Will this expense or decision help or hurt our tax paying community?

The kicker comes about two pages later:

No new taxes until we the Public have been given a full accounting of all money spent from 2000 to 2008.” (emphasis in the original).

Looks like Arlene will be getting my vote.

Thomas J. Mertz

2 Comments

Filed under education, Elections, Local News

Wisconsin State Superintendent Candidates

dpilogo1

There are five announced candidates for the position of State Superintendent of Public Instruction.  Assuming at least three file the necessary signatures by Tuesday, January 6, 2009,  there will be a primary on February 17 and the top two vote getters will be in the general election on April 7.

Here are the candidates, with links to their web sites.

Todd Alan Price (web site now up and more  info here).

Tony Evers.

Lowell Holtz.

Rose Fernandez.

Van Mobley.

Price is the only one who I have been able to find saying good and meaningful things about Wisconsin’s broken school finance system.

  • Fixing the School Funding Formula. Costing out per student what it actually takes to fund an excellent education. Analyzing the tax base for funding the school system, reviewing options to improve the school funding formula and proposing an effective solution to make fair and equitable the allocation of resources for every child.

The Capital Times (via the AP) has more about the candidates.

The story reveals a curious obsession with the Qualified Economic Offer.  The State Superintendent has no constitutional role in changing the QEO and if the last few years are any guide, the bully pulpit doesn’t count for much there either.

Why does our media obsess on the QEO in stories where it is nearly irrelevant and ignore it when it is crucial?  I wish they’d get it right.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under "education finance", Best Practices, education, Elections, Local News, School Finance

Arne Duncan, Secretary of Education

arne-duncan

Just links.  My own thoughts are much like teacherken’s (below).   I’ll add that the charters/merit pay agenda does not make me happy but balance that by saying that at least the merit pay pilot in Chicago included peer evaluations along with test scores.

The New York Times, Schools Chief From Chicago Is Obama’s Choice for Education.

teacherken, Arne Duncan as Sec Ed – it could have been worse.

Alexander Russo, District299: The Chicago Schools Blog, Duncan Pros and Cons.

Greg Palast, Obama’s “Way-to-Go, Brownie!” Moment?.

Education Week, Duncan is Obama’s Education Secretary Pick.

Good discussions in the comments at all but the NYT.

Thomas J, Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under Accountability, Arne Duncan, Best Practices, education, Elections, National News, nclb, No Child Left Behind

Education Tweak, #2

edtweak2

Click on image for pdf

The fun continues.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under Accountability, Best Practices, education, Elections, Gimme Some Truth, National News, nclb, No Child Left Behind

Victory – Move on Up

Just move on up
and keep on wishing
Remember your dreams
are your only schemes
So keep on pushing
Take nothing less –
Never second best
And do not obey –
you must have your say
You can past the test

Curtis Mayfield, “Move on Up.”

The Madison school referendum, the Wisconsin Assembly, of course the Presidency and more — victories worth celebrating and building on.

As Curtis says, “keep on pushing.”  This is just the start.  We need to stay involved and active to in order to move on up.

Thomas J. Mertz

2 Comments

Filed under Accountability, Best Practices, Elections, Local News, National News, Referenda, referendum, Take Action

Thank You Madison

hands

Robert Godfrey

1 Comment

Filed under AMPS, Elections, Local News, Referenda, School Finance

Vote Today! Vote Yes for Schools!

Vote today!  Vote Yes for Schools!

Not much else to say, so some special election day musical selections.

Chis Stamey and Yo la Tengo, “Vote” (click to listen or download).

Chick Webb Orchestra with Ella Fitzgerald, “Vote for Mister Rhythm” (click to listen or download).

Sam Cooke, “A Change is Gonna Come” (click to listen or download).

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Elections, Referenda, referendum, Take Action, Uncategorized

Madison Referendum: More Than Affordable…

Successful Recurring Recurring Referenda as % of Revenue Limits, Nov. 2004 - Nov. 2008.

Successful Recurring Recurring Referenda as % of Revenue Limits, Nov. 2004 - Nov. 2008.

For a number of reasons, I’m fairly confident that the MMSD referendum will pass.  In fact, I still think that Madison could have and should have passed a larger referendum.  I’ll start with the could have and then revisit some of the should have.

The graph at the top of the page shows successful recurring operating referenda since November, 2004 as percentages of the district revenue caps in place at the time of the votes (operating referenda linked to building projects were not included, the final total price was used for multi-year recurring referenda, $13 million in Madison’s case).  The pending Madison referendum is in red.  This referendum represents 4.98% of the district’s revenue limit; the average of all the successful referenda is 8.53%.  If Madison had asked for the average percent, it would have been an over $22 million referendum.  With $22 million, we could have restored valued programs, renewed the maintenance and technology revenue authority, realistically considered new ways to improve the education our district offers, and more.  The lesson here is that other districts, with much less of a culture of educational support, have passed relatively more sizable measures than we are considering.

For further evidence that Madison could have afforded more, we need look no further than the the recently approved 2009-10 budget and mil rate (district documents, here).  Due to greater than expected growth in the tax base, individual tax rates went down more than expected, from 9.92% to 9.81%.  This points to two important things.  First, the starting point for referendum-related tax increases is lower than anticipated.  Second, the quality of our schools continues to be a contributing factor to our healthy local economy.

Affordability is a matter of opinion and it is impossible to prove or disprove the outcome of offering the voters a larger referendum, but both the above pieces of evidence are suggestive of a positive prognosis.  With counterfactuals, that’s about as good as you can do.

I could offer at least 24,189 reasons why there should have been a larger referendum.  I just want to touch briefly on three today.  First, I do not believe that there are $3 million worth of cuts over the next three years that will not have a negative effect on the quality of education our district provides; second, there are many valuable things that have been cut in that past that I think should have been considered for restoration;  last, there will be a need for a maintenance referendum in 2010 and I believe that an extension of this should have been included.

When discussing the quality of education, it is always important to begin with the observation that we are a district with high needs.  We have a higher percentage of students with disabilities, students in poverty and English language learners than the state average (data can be accessed here and is summarized here).  These categories are important, because each of them are covered by underfunded mandates.  Because our percentages are higher and the mandates are underfunded, Madison must spend a higher percentage (than the average district) of our general operating revenue to address these needs.

This is part of the reason that I do not believe that after 15 years and over $60 million worth of cuts, $3 million more worth of “harmless” cuts can be found.   I am not naive enough to pretend that there aren’t programs and positions that are not as effective as they should be, but I do believe that there are also new and old ways that money reallocated from these budget lines could be used to improve the quality of our schools.  As framed by this referendum, any new ideas or restorations of old services will only be possible after $3 million worth of cuts are found.

In a letter to the Cap Times Steve Pike detailed some of the ways past cuts have harmed our schools.  I have touched on some of others here (as well as other places).  Both in local budget discussions and in the fight for state finance reform, I have repeatedly said “we cannot afford to cut more.”  I believe that.  I believe that many of the cuts that have already been made were harmful.  We have more deteriorating facilities, less current technology, larger classes, less community outreach and parent-teacher contact, a smaller variety of offerings, more difficult situations with specials classes, fewer support staff…than we used to have and and we should have.

The maintenance and technology renewal is somewhat different, but just as important.  The 2009-10 school year is the last year of the non-recurring maintenance and technology referendum passed in 2006.  In the 2010-11 year, MMSD will lose $5.5 million in revenue authority from this referendum (while adding an anticipated $4 million or $9 million — depending on how you count it — from the referendum on the ballot November 4).  The current referendum could have been offered so that this amount was included on a recurring basis, beginning in 2010.  This amount would have still left the referendum well below the average (as percentage of revenue limits) of passed recurring referenda pictured at the top.  As far as I can tell this possibility was never publicly considered by the Board of Education.  Because of this oversight, the district, the Board and the community will have to engage in an additional referendum process and campaign.

I’ve been campaigning on behalf of the referendum and will enthusiastically vote yes because the the alternative is so obviously wrong.  My enthusiasm will be tinged with regret that the referendum could have been bigger and better, could have provided more room for dreaming and less need for cutting.  I believe that a referendum like that would have passed also and our children and our community would have both benefited.

The referendum on the ballot is more than affordable, but less than it should have been.  Vote Yes for Schools!

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under "education finance", Best Practices, Budget, education, Elections, finance, Local News, Referenda, referendum, Uncategorized

News from CAST

From the Community and Schools Together website:

Many things going on and many new things on the web site.

We are in the last weeks of literature distribution.  Almost 20,000 homes have been reached, another 10,000 or so will be done this weekend (October 25-26) and next week we want to hit as many more as possible.

On October 25 and 26 we still need help in Fitchburg and in the Falk and Huegel areas.  Next week there will be lots of small things – including Maple Bluff and Brams Addition — and major pushes on the North side and to the South and West.

Without you volunteering, we can’t do anything.  Isn’t assuring that our schools avoid $13 million worth of cuts in the next three years worth an hour or so of your time?

To help, email madisoncast@sbcglobal.net or fill out this form.

New on the web site is an up-to-date Endorsement Page, including a letter signed by 49 local elected officials.

The Press/Media Page has also been updated, with videos, a radio interview, many editorials and opinion pieces, more do-it-yourself Advocacy material, and all the latest news reports.

Check out the district referendum pages also.

More updates coming soon.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under "education finance", Best Practices, Budget, education, Elections, finance, Local News, Referenda, referendum, School Finance, Take Action, Uncategorized