Category Archives: Referenda

My Referendum and Budget Letter

April 19, 2007
Members of the MMSD Board of Education
545 West Dayton Street
Madison, WI 53703

I am asking today that the Board of Education begin planning for an operating referendum to be held on February 19th, 2008 and pending the outcome of that referendum refrain from closing schools and eliminating programs that will be difficult to restart.

The budget recommendations presented by the administration are not unreasonable, but they are far from desirable. The broken state finance system has forced the consideration of many undesirable options. The consolidation plans and the elimination of strings would be difficult to undo and would cause long range harm to our community’s faith in and support for our schools. I believe that there are other, also undesirable but less irreparable ways to balance the 2007-2008 budget. A successful well-designed referendum would move the district’s budget discussions from trying to do the least harm to trying to do the most good.

Referenda are not easy; they require the board to have the courage to say there is no other way, they require hard work on the part of volunteer community members willing to educate the electorate on the good our schools do and the harm being done by the state finance system, they divide our communities and can reveal a loss of faith in our schools, or Board members and our administration. They are also the only tool we have to under the current system to assure that our children get the education they deserve and our community is allowed to support the schools as we wish. I sat through many of the Special Joint Committee on School Finance sessions in 2006. As district after district related heartbreaking stories of the cuts they had made due to the broken school funding system, they were told again and again by some committee members that best and only answer was to “go to referendum.” I don’t believe it is the only answer – I am one of many in Madison and statewide who are working to fix that system – but it is the only answer we have in the short term.

Many in Madison believe that a referendum is needed now or will at very least be needed for the 2008-2009 budget. School closings will make this referendum more difficult to pass.

Referenda are often called band-aids. There is some truth to this in that they do not provide a long-term cure to the ills of under funded schools. However, they do staunch the bleeding and buy time for a cure to be obtained. If your child were bleeding, you would use whatever was at hand to stop that bleeding before they suffered irreparable harm. That is what I am asking the board to do.

I am not alone in this. You will be receiving a letter with close to 150 signatures, asking the same thing. These signatories and those who collected them have demonstrated their willingness to do the work to educate the community and work for the passage of a referendum. Please have the courage give them that chance and give the voters of Madison the opportunity to make their voices heard at the ballot box.

Thomas J. Mertz

J.C. Wright Middle School Parent
2007-2008 Franklin-Randall Parent
Member MMSD Equity Task Force
Member Advocates for Madison Public Schools
Co-Chair Communities and Schools Together
Member Wisconsin Alliance for Excellent Schools

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Budget, Equity, Local News, Referenda, School Finance, Take Action

It Could Be Worse

There has been some tension between MMSD Board members and administrators, but generally the relationships have been civil and those involved have displayed mutual respect. All involved should be proud of this.

The situation in the Menomonie Area district appears to be pretty bad. (More here and here.)

Besides limiting contact between board members and administrators, the March 30 letter tells school board members that administrators have been instructed to notify Harness if a school board member contacts them by phone, e-mail or in person.

In addition, the letter requires administrators to request permission from Harness before contacting a school board member; they must also provide a reason for doing so.

According to the memo, Harness must be present during any meetings between administrators and school board members and that the meetings must be prearranged.

The letter, signed by the administrators in the district, indicated that they felt their trust had been violated when an alternate staffing plan was introduced at a March 19 school board meeting. The plan was aimed at saving programs and positions in an effort to forestall the need for a referendum at this time.

I don’t think you can blame this entirely on the state finance system, but clearly the pressures of annual budget conflicts and the difficulties of referenda are part of it.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Budget, Referenda, School Finance, We Are Not Alone

Saving Schools and More

A group of parents and community members has begun organizing to agitate for an operating referendum to be placed on the ballot February 19th 2008 (the Spring Primary, including presidential). The details of the referendum are still in the early planning stages. I am part of this group.

As they consider the 2007-2008 budget (including school closings), it is important to show the Board of Education that there is broad and growing support for this referendum. With the realistic possibility of a successful referendum prior to the next budget cycle the Board can be induced to take nearly irreversible cuts (such as closing schools or eliminating 5th Grade Strings) off the table for this year.

You can help with this. There is a letter that will be submitted to the Board on April 19th here. If you support this, please say so and add your name and information in the comments. There are also some talking points here. We are asking that as many people as possible attend the upcoming Board meetings (April 17th and April 19th in particular) and express support for a referendum and not cutting those things that will be difficult to restore. We are also asking that individuals and groups contact the Board and news outlets (Capital Times: tctvoice@madison.com; Wisconsin State Journal: wsjopine@madison.com) to express support.

As always, educating and agitating on the state finance system that has created these conditions is important.

Thank you

Thomas J. Mertz

26 Comments

Filed under AMPS, Budget, Elections, Local News, Referenda, School Finance, Take Action, We Are Not Alone

I Just Want to Be A School Volunteer Again: An Open Letter to Joint Finance the Governor Doyle on School Finance Reform

Dear Members of the Joint Committee on Finance and Gov. Doyle,

I used to be an active parent volunteer in the Madison public schools. I helped with reading groups and on field trips when my children were in elementary school, then tutored middle schoolers and tutored and led after-school clubs as my children got older.

Then a couple years ago, I had to stop my in-class volunteering. Why? Like hundred of parents and school staff across the state, all my volunteer hours were eaten up with supporting a series of referenda to keep intact programs that both benefited my children and are needed to support the learning of thousands of Wisconsin’s children. Over the past 8 years, I have seen music and arts programs cut, driver’s education eliminated, family and consumer education and technology education at the middle schools eliminated, class sizes increased and sorely-needed social work, counseling and psychology positions cuts.

Still, the cuts loom large. This year, schools with great reputations and devoted community support may close. Activity fees will continue to increase. Middle school and high school course options are at risk. I paid more last year on start-of-school fees and supplies than I did on Christmas gifts. Yet, the cuts go on, the fees continue to rise.

So, what’s involved in passing a referendum? There are multiple evening meetings to PTA groups and neighborhood associations to educate them on complicated school finance issues. There are letters to write, phone calls to make, meetings to attend, signs to assemble, fundraising to organize, and general public relations discussions to have with neighbors, colleagues, friends and relatives. You lose friends. It’s very political and it’s not very fun. And to top it all off, it pulls hundreds of civic-minded, good-hearted, kid-loving adults away from children, classrooms and teaching and into a role they never asked for and don’t relish: politics and deal-making.

I’ve heard elected officials say that before a school district should come to the legislature for funding, they should really work a little harder locally at passing a referendum. What? I was under the impression that teachers, principals, superintendents and other school leaders were hired to educate children, not launch political campaigns. I want my district’s principals hiring and supervising teams of high-quality teachers and exploring new ways to teach students in meaningful ways, not spend their days on talk radio and their evenings at civic forums.

And I want to go back into classrooms again. I want to talk to kids about their passions and comment on their improvements in writing, not spend Saturdays stapling yard signs together and Sunday afternoons strategizing on campaign slogans or calling long voter lists.

So, I am asking please, that the State Legislature:
— Fund at two-thirds its original commitment to categorical aids, the program that provides special education services to students with disabilities. This would mean a $45 million increase in the first year of new budget and $55 million next year.
— Continue its commitment to SAGE programs that cap class sizes to 15 in schools with high poverty rates.
— Remove the revenue caps that make districts across the state incapable of simultaneously balancing their budgets and retaining existing program levels for students.

Beth Swedeen

4 Comments

Filed under AMPS, Budget, Elections, Referenda, School Finance, Take Action

Fact Check

John Nichols’ column today is yet another example of how little attention the media in our town pay to school matters and school politics. His thesis is that Maya Cole’s support for a referendum and Marj Passman’s caution was decisive. Nice theory, too bad the premises are wrong. Of all the candidates, Marj Passman was the only one who whole-heartedly supported Carol Carstensen’s proposal. Ms Cole gave answers about finding new partnerships and efficiencies and innovations and never expressed clear support for the proposal. She may have even said she did not support it (I’d have to look at videos of forums to be sure). Examples of the answers from each can be found here.

If you ask me, the decisive factor was the endorsement by Mr. Nichols’ own paper and if this is any indication of the thought and work that went into that endorsement…words fail me.

What makes this even worse is that days before the Capital Times gave Ms Cole a “strong” endorsement (which after the election they clarified by saying they would have been “perfectly satisfied” to see either candidate win — I hope I have the time to write something about that editorial, good and bad), Mr Nichols himself expressed support for Ms Carstensen’s proposal.

I really don’t know what to make of this. I do know that our community is ill served by irresponsible journalism.

I also know that the talk of partnerships and efficiencies and innovation (none of which are bad in and of themselves) has been used to distract from the very real needs for finance reform and the need for referendums under our current system. Marj Passman knew this and said it. Ms Cole benefited from the way these distractions attracted the votes of the “we already spend too much on schools” crowd and she never (in any public statement I can find or — to the best of my recollection — at any of the many forums I attended) made a clear statement in support of Ms Carstensen’s referendum proposal.

Wipe the egg off your face and apologize Mr Nichols.

Thomas J. Mertz

6 Comments

Filed under AMPS, Elections, Gimme Some Truth, Local News, Referenda

We Are Not Alone #7

Part of series on school finance and referenda around Wisconsin.

Updates from the DPI on the April 3d referenda votes:

· Totals = 34 Passed, 36 Failed (no results from Thorp)
· Issue Debt (building and renovation) = 15 Passed, 16 Failed
· Non Recurring (operating and maintenance) = 14 Passed, 10 Failed
· Recurring (operating and maintenance) = 5 Passed, 10 Failed
· Largest Operating = $21,601,931 (Eau Claire Area) Failed (6,570 to 8,385)

There is already one new referendum on the ballot, the Menomonie Area Board moved fast when faced with unpalatable cuts and scheduled a referendum for May 15th.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Elections, Referenda, School Finance, We Are Not Alone

School Districts Statewide Face Referenda

The front page of the WSJ has an excellent story on the 52 school districts across Wisconsin (out of a total of 425) that face referenda on Tuesday. That’s 1 out of every 8 school districts in the state seeking a reprieve from revenue caps this Tuesday alone. It details the drastic cuts districts already have made under 14 years of revenue cuts, and the tremendous pressure and ill will communities face as they are forced to take sides in prioritizing dwindling funds.

There are those in Madison who continue to say that if MMSD just had a long-term plan and better management, the schools would be fine. The fat has been cut, folks. Efficiencies continue to be on everyone’s minds, but efficiencies won’t cut $8-$10 million a year into eternity.

Under the leadership of Arlene Silveira and other board members, MMSD is urging residents to get involved in a statewide effort to lobby the governor and the legislature to refinance public education in the state. It’s not too late to make some significant changes for this year.

If you live in Mark Miller or Mark Pocan’s districts in Madison, CALL them. They are on the powerful Joint Finance Committee, which is taking up the Governor’s budget with a series of hearings that will continue through April.
Call them if they aren’t your legislators, too.

If you want to know who your legislators are, go to http://waml.legis.state.wi.us

Beth Swedeen

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Referenda, School Finance, We Are Not Alone

We Are Not Alone #6

Another in a series on school finance and referenda in Wisconsin. Unless you believe that mismanagement is endemic to public schools, I think it should be pretty clear that the budget problems in MMSD are not the result of bad or no decision making by our Board and administration. They are the result of bad or no decsion making by our legislatures and governors.

This is a round up of news from Western Wisconsin

Referendums Everywhere

Spring elections are less than a week away and many school districts are depending on your vote to determine whether they get more money to run the schools. If you think there are only one or two referendums in this area, think again.

15 school districts around Western Wisconsin are seeking referendums come April 3rd. One of those districts includes the Independence School District which faces a $70,000 deficit and is asking for $800,000 for 4 years.

School administrator Dave Leahn says they’ve already cut $750,000 in the past year to make ends meet, but they can’t make anymore cuts so now they’re asking for money to keep the school going, “district administrators, reading specialist, learning disability teachers, to custodians, to secretaries.”

Leahn and other staff are worried more cuts will only diminish the quality of education. He says more cuts will mean eliminating a whole program or even grades since the small school only has one section of each grade or program. Leahn and many other school administrators blame the budget problems on the state’s revenue system where the money districts receive are largely based on enrollment numbers.

“If you’re receiving approximately $100,000 in revenue and your expenditures were $200,000, it’s going to catch up with you.

That’s why Leahn says we’re seeing so many referendums coming Tuesday. Independence faces an $800,000 referendum, Eau Claire will have a referendum, New Richmond is seeking more than $2 million, Thorp as well as Lake Holcombe and Barron Area School Districts are also seeking money.

The budget problems are not only in Western Wisconsin but all over the state. Countless numbers of districts across the state are also seeking referendums.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Budget, Elections, Referenda, School Finance, We Are Not Alone

We Are Not Alone #5

Part of a series of posts on school finance and referendums around the state.

Too many referendums and too much news to cover it all. Just a once over this time.

Shell Lake and Spooner have referenda questions on the ballot. The Shell Lake superintendent described the familiar situation:

Superintendent Jerry Gauderman said Shell Lake’s school expenses, as in other school districts, are rising at 4 percent a year while revenue is increasing at only 2 percent. And like many districts in Northern Wisconsin, Shell Lake has experienced a declining enrollment which affects the revenue limit based on student enrollment.

The Spooner business manager explained their situation

The money will be used, primarily, to keep existing programs in place, said school officials. They noted earlier this year that a casulty of a failed referendum may be the elimination of 20 positions, at least three-quarters of them teaching jobs.

Andrew Sarnow, district business manager, projects that without additional funding the district will experience deficits of $1.01 million in the 2007-08 school year; $1.62 million in 2008-09; $2.273 million in 2009-10; and $2.996 million, 2010-11.

The district plans to cut roughly $200,000 in both 2007-08 and 2008-09.
Along with the cuts, if the program maintenance referendum passes, the district will accrue a surplus in the first two years that will cover the larger deficits expected in 2009-10 and 2010-11.

Oconomowoc has a different problem. They are growing, but the rolling average employed to calculate the revenue caps hurts growing districts.

Barry said most of the districts that are struggling are districts with declining enrollment and therefore declining revenue, although their costs are somewhat fixed. In districts where enrollment is flat, so is the revenue.

“Yet their costs are going up; health insurance for example. That scenario should not be unfamiliar to anybody in Oconomowoc. This district struggled with flat and declining enrollment for 10 years, and it obviously weakened the district’s balance sheet substantially over that period,” Barry pointed out.

“As we look forward to next year, we have a different scenario. Unlike many of our neighboring districts, and unlike almost 70 percent of the districts in our state, Oconomowoc has increasing enrollment, and in our case we have rapidly increasing enrollment,” the assistant superintendent said.

Despite, or because of that advantage, a new circumstance arises that requires prudent planning.

“Our challenge is that the revenue formula, the three-year rolling average, by definition, lags behind your actual enrollment year to year.
“Therein lies the difficulty for us. Our revenue has not caught up to the size of the district and the size of the staff to support the district,” Barry said.

“The problem this year is can we, in the budget, earmark enough revenue for the additional staffing that we need? It’s a growth problem, not a cutting problem,” Barry said.

In Baraboo, school board candidates are talking referenda (and private financing)

The “R word” made an appearance in a question over whether the candidates would support a go at another referendum. All said they would. It’s perhaps surprising that an anti-referendum candidate didn’t surface when about half of the district’s voters opposed both attempts last year to increase its levy and there was organized opposition to the measure.

Maxwell, who ran on an anti-referendum platform three years ago, said his experience in the trenches of the district’s operations and finances have changed his perspective.
“I sat on this stage before and fought my personal demons on the word ‘referendum,'” he said. They’ve made the cuts the “no” votes forced upon them and became more efficient, Maxwell said.

“I see no options for this district based on the cuts we made in the past, the priorities we’ve set and the goals we want to achieve,” Vodak said. “I wish it didn’t have to come to that.”

Anderson said if the state’s school funding formula doesn’t change a referendum will be inevitable.

“We need to stop voting for state representatives that don’t listen to us and say take care of it at the community level,” Hovde said.

All candidates also agreed that cuts to the music program last year should be reinstated and that such a vital piece of the district’s educational offerings shouldn’t be left to private fund-raising.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Budget, Elections, Referenda, School Finance, We Are Not Alone

We Are Not Alone #4

I’m going to try to pull together some excerpts from local reports on April 3d school referenda in the next few days (for the next We Are Not Alone entry). This is just an overview of those measures from the DPI listing.

· Total Referenda = 72
· Total Districts = 53 (about 1/8 of the districts in the state)
· Total Issue Debt (mostly building and renovation) = 33
· Total Non Recurring (operating and maintenance) = 24
· Total Recurring (operating and maintenance) = 15
· Largest Operating = $21,601,931 (Eau Claire Area)

If recent trends continue, about half will pass. This is not a system that is working for the children of our state.

Thomas J. Mertz

1 Comment

Filed under AMPS, Elections, Referenda, School Finance, We Are Not Alone