2008 Presidential Candidates and Positions on Education

Folks,

As the presidential campaigns are moving forward, I thought it might be good to provide a summary of candidate positions on public education.

There is a very wide field of views, from those arguing for universal pre-school opportunities (Edwards) to giving parents more control of schools (Giuliani). No endorsement here… just hoping you can review the field of candidate positions on education.

You might say that it is too early to worry about this. But, consider that the candidate’s views, while they tend to change a bit during the campaign, are most heavily formulated and transparent now. Once the primaries are over, we often see less details and more vague phrases like “I support education”.

I’ve tried to list as many of the candidates as I could. Most websites have video.

– Jerry Eykholt

Washington Post – Field of Presidential Candidates for 2008 Election:
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/2008-presidential-candidates/

On the Issues.Org: summary of candidate’s positions on education:
http://www.ontheissues.org/Education.htm

A set of candidates at the NEA Meeting in July (YouTube videos):
http://www.nea.org/annualmeeting/raaction/07candidates.html

Former Sen. Edwards:
http://johnedwards.com/media/video/des-moines-ia-education-speech

Sen. Obama:
http://obama.senate.gov/speech/051025-teaching_our_ki/

Sen. Clinton:
http://www.nea.org/annualmeeting/raaction/07clintonspeech.html

Gov. Richardson:
http://www.richardsonforpresident.com/issues/education

Gov. Romney:
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/08/16/politics/p171851D00.DTL

Former Mayor Giuliani: ( I had trouble finding other video)
http://blip.tv/file/355235/
http://workingcalifornians.com/candidate_position/rudy_giuliani_on_education

Gov. Romney
http://www.mittromney.com/Issue-Watch/Education

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Elections

Young Lobbyists

2

I’ve been too busy to post a follow up on the September 18th visit to the Capitol to advocate for state school finance reform. Sorry for the delay.

Let me start by thanking all those who participated. We had a good crowd, about thirty total in three groups, most under age twelve. As you can imagine it was a bit chaotic, but the energy was great. Next time we’ll try to be better organized…there will be next time and a time after that and beyond.

The kids were great and I loved the signs they brought. The parents were great too. I was impressed by how well informed their comments and questions were and how they pushed the legislators and staff to get past the canned talking points.

When I was thinking about it later it came to me that one of the things I like about Madison is that many people believe that they can make a difference, that they can create positive change. That was the spirit I saw in our group and the lesson I saw our children learning. How wonderful.

On one hand we know that a handful of parents and children is not going to undo the damage done by the $366,674 that Wisconsin Manufactures and Commerce spent lobbying from January to June of 2007. On the other hand we know that if we refuse to be ignored, we can do some good. It is the William Lloyd GarrisonI will be heard” attitude. Keep it up!

We will be doing more of this, stay tuned for details. For now I want ask for a couple more things. First, for those who joined us at the Capitol a quick note to the offices you visited — thanking them for their time and reiterating the purpose of our effort — would be a good idea. All the legislators are listed here. The notes, letters and calls from those who couldn’t make it are always good too. I would especially push Brett Davis on the timeline of his proposal and for a better, less political explanation of why he refuses to give the Pope-Roberts resolution a hearing. The second request has to do with the Wisconsin Alliance for Excellent Schools (disclosure, I’m a Board member of WAES). WAES has been doing the best work on state education finance reform for years. Recently it became clear that we will not be able to depend on foundation funding in the future and would need to find an alternate way to keep going. We are in the midst of transitioning to a dues structure. On October 1, Tom Beebe (of WAES) will be doing a presentation to the MMSD Board of Education Communications Committee, explaining the changes and beginning the process of asking that our district become a dues paying partner. There will be public comment that evening and your support would be appreciated.

Thanks to all again, especially those who got this started and the kids.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Budget, Local News, Pope-Roberts/Breske Resolution, School Finance, Take Action

Collaboration and Merit Pay

Nate at The Proletariat has a worthwhile post on how the metric of individual merit present in most (all?) proposals for instituting merit pay for teachers fails to recognize the collaborate reality of our schools.

Excerpt (full post here):

In the beginning of the school year you are likely to see ESL, Title, and Reading Recovery staff all chipping in to assess children in reading. You are also likely to see Title staff in your room delivering instruction along with the classroom teacher. It is also highly likely that in order to meet the academic needs of other students, a teacher will send students to other classrooms, and other students will come to yours.

This sort of collaboration is not limited to reading, but also occurs in math, science and social studies. It is that old Vygotskian proverb that the interaction or process of H20 can not be explained by isolating the individual elements. Isolating a classroom teacher from their larger ensemble or school culture is akin to examining a fish out of water. Meritocracy will discourage all the behaviors that educational school reform has been based on for the last ten years. Teachers will become resistant to collaboration with other teachers and staff which has been so essential to student progress.

This is yet another reason the business models for education reform don’t make sense.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Best Practices, Contracts, Local News

Quote of the Day

Crime aside, what is the second biggest issue you think Madison is facing?

I would imagine that after dealing with poverty and crime, working with the state to developing a fair tax structure to support public education

Paul Soglin

I’d only add that these are far from unrelated issues.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Budget, Local News, Quote of the Day, School Finance

My Superintendent Profile Form

The whole thing is linked here (I know I didn’t spend enough time on the rankings). Previously I wrote that I was struggling with number 5. This is what I came up with:

Madison Metropolitan School District
SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH
LEADERSHIP PROFILE ASSESSMENT

Attachment
5. Tell us your vision for the School District for the future.

I believe that public education is our best means of creating a better future; a future with less inequality, more understanding, greater prosperity and a stronger sense of citizenship. I also understand that fulfilling this mission – especially at a time when public education is under attack from many quarters and under a state finance system that values tax relief more than education – is and will remain an ongoing struggle. Districts like MMSD have an important role to play in the national debates over the mission and assessment of public education. We are a district of high expectations, high needs and great inequalities. We are also a community that supports our schools and believes that students of all backgrounds can and must be successful. Like other districts in the Minority Student Achievement Network (the first place I would look for candidates), we are a proving ground and have the great opportunity to demonstrate that public education can fulfill its mission, can provide opportunities for all, and can create a better future.

The best statement of what the next steps in this direction would be can be found in the work of the Equity Task Force (http://www.madison.k12.wi.us/boe/equity/). I would ask that all finalists read and respond to the Final Task Force Report (and appendices).

At minimum, the profile should reflect a commitment to the Task Force’s definition of equity:

Equity assures full access to opportunities for each MMSD student to achieve educational excellence and social responsibility.

I attended one of the focus groups this afternoon and thought that the consultant did a very good job.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Best Practices, Contracts, Equity, Local News

Superintendent Leadership Profile(s)

Many of us will be participating in the development of a leadership profile for the superintendent search this week. This is an exciting and important opportunity. It is my understanding that the profile will be used to draft advertisements, guide “head-hunting” contacts and screen candidates.

I thought others might be interested in seeing what a leadership profile looks like; how our contributions will be presented to the board and used by the consultants. With that in mind, I’ve scoured the net and located the following profiles prepared by Hazard, Young and Attea & Associates, Ltd.

Walnut Creek.

Indian Prairie and here.

Riverland Central.

Brandywine School District.

Birmingham(MI).

I also found this one, Winnetka (IL) — from a diferent consultant — interesting.

Lots of thought provoking reading. One thing that caught my attention is how little weight was given to experience in these profiles. I rank that pretty high…Madison does not need a “learn on the job” type.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Contracts, Local News, Take Action

School Funding Action: Capitol Visit 9/18

Tuesday September 18th is an in-service day for MMSD and a group of parents have decided to take this opportunity to bring their children to the Capitol to remind our elected officials of the need to do a better job funding education.

The details and some notes about talking points below:

First, the simple details (flier here):

  • Meet at the State entrance 10:00 AM, 9/18.
  • Senators Risser and Robson, Representatives Pocan, Pope Roberts and Berceau have all been contacted and are expecting us. The legislature will convene at 11:00, the elected officials have full schedules and we may end up speaking to staff in one or more of the offices.
  • MMSD is also represented by Senators Erpenbach and Miller and Representatives Travis, Black and Parsi. We will try to contact them in advance.
  • It has been suggested that the Chairs of the Assembly Education Committee (Brett Davis) and the Assembly Education Reform Committee (Donald Pridemore) also get visits (more on that below).
  • Under the circumstances, I think it would be a good idea to bring short, personal letters that we can leave with the legislators or their staffs (letters from kids would be great! My 12-year-old son is writing one letter addressed to “Senators and Representatives” and we will bring multiple copies).
  • With the tight time frame we will probably divide up (and conquer!).
  • Bringing signs would be good too (not allowed in chambers, but OK in hallways).

    That should take care of the who, where and when. The what got very complicated these last few days. I’m going to try to make this as simple as possible but need to give some background (skip down to the talking points at the end if you like).

    The state finance system is a mess, a big mess. The Wisconsin Legislature is in the middle of negotiations on the biennial budget but none of the proposals on the table address the fundamental problems of the school finance system, the big mess. However, except for some relatively small differences as of Thursday September 13, the parties all back different versions of something very much like the best proposal anyone put forth. Points of agreement include items like the standard annual revenue limit increases, increased SAGE funding and special education aid; all of which would help Madison’s schools and many other districts. This would be good news except for the fact that the GOP want this considered separate from the budget negotiations and the Democrats don’t want to separate anything.

    So all the parties have essentially agreed on the structure and level of school funding, but conflict remains. This may change by Tuesday when the Assembly is scheduled to take up their k-12 bill.

    I don’t think it is a good idea for advocates of school finance reform to take sides in this conflict, but use your own judgment. What I do think we all should do is thank the Legislators of all a parties for supporting in one form or another the good things this budget will provide for the schools and continue to push for systematic reform, to demand that they do better.

    The structural gap between allowed revenues and expenses in the current system, even under the best-case scenario with this budget cycle, will continue to create annual cuts in programming and services of about 1.5%. Special education aid from the state will still only cover about 30% of the costs and bilingual reimbursements from the state will cover less than 12% of the costs. Almost all schools and districts that take advantage of the proven SAGE class size reductions will have to find cuts elsewhere to pay for this wonderful but underfunded program. Over 100 districts have held referenda in the last year. Districts with declining enrollments and rising enrollments face different but equally destructive shortfalls under the current system. This system, the system the budget won’t touch, wreaks havoc in the biggest cities, the small towns, the rural districts, the North woods… Throughout the state educators and students find themselves struggling each year to do more with less.

    Representative Sondy Pope Roberts has introduced a Joint Resolution (with 60 co-sponsors) calling for the Legislature to create a new system with funding levels based on the real costs of education, sufficient state resources for districts to meet mandates and enough flexibility to address the diverse needs of districts in the state. This is the best shot to move real reform forward this session. A hearing by the Senate Education Committee has been scheduled for November 15th. The Assembly Education and Education Reform Committee Chairs have not agreed to schedule hearings.

    Based on the above, these are my suggested talking points:

    Thank you for supporting the band-aid relief in this budget cycle.
    o Revenue limit increases
    o SAGE funding increases
    o Special Education funding increases

    The system remains broken
    o Structural gap between revenue limits and costs
    o Underfunded mandates and programs
    o Diverse needs inadequately addressed
    o Schools and children are struggling
    o Wisconsin cannot remain competitive if this continues

    Real reform needed

    Pope-Roberts Resolution will move real reform forward

    Support the resolution

    More information links:

    WisPolitics Budget Blog (best source for both background and up to the minute info)

    MMSD Budget Info

    Wisconsin Alliance for Excellent Schools

    Carol Carstensen’s brief explanation of the state school finance system

    Past Present and Future MMSD Budget Cuts

    Thomas J. Mertz

  • Leave a comment

    Filed under AMPS, Budget, Local News, Pope-Roberts/Breske Resolution, School Finance, Take Action

    Who is the Winner? (Quote of the Day)

    “Basically, Republicans agreed to the education funding levels proposed by Democrats,” Schultz said. “The record high $9.5 billion in state aid for K-12 education will make property taxpayers the big winner, especially if the final agreement includes a levy limit that protects property taxpayers.”

    State Senator Dale Schultz

    Wouldn’t be nice if we had a school finance system where the children were the “big winner[s]”?

    Thomas J. Mertz

    Leave a comment

    Filed under AMPS, Budget, Quote of the Day, School Finance

    3 Books to Add to Your List

    I found three great books at the library’s new nonfiction section.

    “Can we talk about race?”, by Beverly Daniel Tatum (Beacon Press, 2007). Prof. Tatum is the President of Spelman College and author of the recent book, “Why are all the black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?” This book has a strong emphasis on education, and it is a great one to raise awareness on racial issues in general. I’ll try to post a bit of a review in a few days.

    “The Last Word: The Best Commentary and Controversy in American Education”, Education Week, Jossey-Bass Press (2007). This is a set of essays from Education Week from a wide range of perspectives. Topics include The Art of Teaching, Equity and Social Justice, Testing, Curriculum, Technology, Democracy, Reform, Charter Schools, and Leadership. Writers include John Hope Franklin, Henry Louis Gates, Jr., Diane Ravitch, Pedro Noguera, Dorothy Rich, Alfie Kohn, Bill Clinton, Theodore Sizer, Edwin Delattre, John Goodlad, Adam Urbanski, and others. How can you call yourself a school policy wonk if you didn’t read this book?

    “In Code: A Young Woman’s Mathematical Journey”, by Sarah Flannery (Algonquin Books, 2002). Ok, this one isn’t new, but it was to me. It’s Sarah Flannery’s account of her passion for mathematics (especially cryptography) and winning Ireland’s Young Scientist of the Year award in 1999, a the age of 16. I wasn’t so fascinated by the award – someone had to win it, right? I was fascinated by her writing and enthusiasm for the math. She walks you through the world of prime numbers, Fermat’s Little Theorem, and much more. Although she had some help on the book from her dad, David Flannery from the Cork Institute of Technology, her voice and story really do rise to the top.

    Happy reading!

    – Jerry Eykholt (TJ let me log-in as him so I could post – let’s see if this worked!)

    Leave a comment

    Filed under AMPS, Equity

    Quotes of the Day (We are Not Alone #17)

    Chetek School District begins considering an operating referendum.

    “What we heard loud and clear from the community was that we want everything and more for our kids…Obviously, with our budget dwindling, we’re going to have to do something to meet the expectations of the community.”

    Genie Jennings, President Chetek School District, Board of Education

    “I think we have to do it. It’s not a debatable issue. The question is, ‘Is it going to be a community-wide effort with help from the board?’…I think the community will pay for what they perceive as quality, performance and value,…Doing more with less may actually happen, but to provide good services frugally, and to be competitive, we’re going to have to create more opportunities for students. That is the real focus.”

    Ken Jost, Member Chetek School District, Board of Education

    Thomas J. Mertz

    Leave a comment

    Filed under AMPS, Budget, Quote of the Day, Referenda, School Finance, We Are Not Alone