Category Archives: AMPS

Gender inequality and the math gap

A very interesting study appearing last week in the journal “Science” relied on a test from the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). It assessed over 275,000 15 year old teenagers in 40 countries. One of the most fascinating conclusions of this study was that, despite the usual reported gap in math and reading scores between boys and girls, the explanation for such a discrepancy could perhaps lie not in biology but instead could have more to do with gender equality. John Timmer from Ars Technica reports:

On average, girls scored about 2 percent lower than boys on math, but nearly 7 percent higher on reading, consistent with previous test results.

The researchers, noted, however, that the math gap wasn’t consistent between countries. For example, it was nearly twice as large as the average in Turkey, while Icelandic girls outscored males by roughly 2 percent. The general pattern of these differences suggested to the authors that the performance differences correlated with the status of women. The authors of the study built a composite score that reflected the gender equality of the countries based on the World Economic Forum’s Gender Gap Index, data extracted from the World Values Surveys, measures of female political participation, and measures of the economic significance of females.

Scandinavian countries such as Norway and Sweden score very high on gender equality measures; in these nations, the gender gap on math performance is extremely small. In contrast, nations at the other end of the spectrum, such as Turkey and Korea, had the largest gender gap. The correlations between gender equality and math scores held up under a statistical test designed to catch spurious associations. The authors even checked out the possibility of genetic effects not linked to the Y chromosome by examining whether genetic similarity between various European populations could account for these differences, but they found that it could not.

The frightening thing, from a male perspective, is that a lack of gender equality also seems to be holding down girls’ reading scores. Female superiority in reading tests is slightly lower than average in Turkey, but the gap is actually wider in countries with greater equality between the sexes. In Iceland, for example, girls outscore boys by well over 10 percent.

The math gender gap thus joins a long list of differences in test scores that were once ascribed to biology, but now appear to be caused by social influences. The study, however, leaves us with yet another question of this sort: why do boys appear to read so poorly? We clearly can’t ascribe it to social inequality, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t due to some other social factor.

Robert Godfrey

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Gimme Some Truth, National News

James C. Wright Middle School by the Numbers

Curtis Mayfield and the Impressions — We’re a Winner (listen)

The Wisconsin Knowledge and Concepts test results for November 2007 have been released (this lag of over six months make the results nearly worthless as a formative assessment for timely targeting at the school, class or individual level). I’ll have more to say about Madison’s results in the coming week or weeks (see here for the District analysis, here for the Cap Times story, and here for the Wisconsin State Journal’s).

Right now I just want to brag on my son’s school, James C. Wright Middle School.

In almost every category and on almost every test, Wright Students scored very well. For me most importantly, with very few exceptions the economically disadvantaged and English Language Learner students out performed their peers in Madison and in Wisconsin. This is a school with an 85%+ poverty rate, 90% minority population, beating the odds and achieving success for (almost) all.

Here is the chart for reading by economic status.

And reading by English Proficiency (something strange with the terminology when 63% of students labeled Limited English Proficient score advanced or proficient in reading).

The obvious question is “what is Wright doing right?” My answer is many things, most of which would not turn up in a Value Added Analysis and if they did would be difficult to reproduce. Chief among these are Leadership, staff and community. Principal Nancy Evans does a great job (as recognized by Wisconsin Urban Schools Leadership Project). The staff works hard and smart and works together (the last is partially a product of leadership). There is a school community and it is a community school; The staff, parents, students and much of the central Southside have a sense of ownership with Wright (this is in part a product of history, but it is a legacy that has been nurtured).

Other factors that may be reproducible are that Wright is a small school and it has the least ability grouping or tracking of any of the middle schools in Madison.

It is also a charter school, but as anyone familiar with Wright knows, it really functions more as a magnet/specialty school.

Congratulations to the Wright community for job well done (not mission accomplished, the work goes on). Panther Pride!

(Note that to access fuller data go to the WINSS site. Because of the way the site handles cookies, linking is difficult).

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under Accountability, AMPS, Best Practices, education, Equity, Local News, Uncategorized

Equity: What happened?

Click the image for more on this excellent book. It can be found in the Madison Public Library.

The Board of Education will consider and vote on a new equity policy on Monday. There will be public appearances.

In my opinion the draft policy is a huge step backward, from the work of the Task Force, from the direction the Board had been going and from the current policy.

The key is “what does the Board do with the policy.” At the prior meeting on Equity the Board worked with a document that included “considerations for determining whether equity is or will be provided” . These were the answers to that question, they moved from words to action.

The minutes of the April 21 Board of Education meeting (the last time equity was on the agenda) read:

“It was moved by Johnny Winston, Jr. and seconded by Lucy Mathiak to keep the Definition, Assumptions, and Goals and to ask the Superintendent for formulate a policy that incorporates the Considerations and bring it back to the Board. Motion unanimously carried.

The “draft policy” for Monday doesn’t “incorporate” the “Considerations,” it simply eliminates them.

I’ll add that the reporting measures in the draft policy are very, very thin (thinner than the current, really nothing more than NCLB and State laws require in terms of reporting) and that there are no actions contemplated at all in the policy.

I don’t know what happened, why there are no “Considerations” or contemplated actions in the draft. Maybe the work on the “Considerations” and other things will go forward in a different way at a different time, but I think that it is a very bad move to enact such a “do nothing” policy. Join me Monday at the meeting to find out what’s going on and stop this before it is too late (there will be public appearances).

While I’m on my soap box, I want to add that there are some things — like the socio-economic diversity, open access to advanced programming, support for heterogeneous classrooms, early childhood/4k — where we recommended specific policies and actions and the Board has never in any form discussed, considered or addressed the recommendations (note, despite what some think, the Task Force never expected to “restrict” the Board’s “exercise of independent judgment” or “tell” any Board member “what to do,” but we did expect the Board to give our recommendations thorough exploration and apply their collective judgment This still seems like a reasonable expectation). Even with the ‘Considerations,” there is more work to be done.

I hate to see all the work of the Task Force, the Board of Education and the Administration end with a policy that is next to useless.

There is a certain strangeness that a member of the Task Force (me) which has been mischaracterized as being overly concerned with words is now protesting a draft policy because it is little more than words in a policy book. Of course if this policy is passed, then the critique will be correct, but the fault will not lay with the Task Force.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under Accountability, AMPS, Best Practices, education, Equity, Local News, Take Action, Uncategorized

Lead exposure and more

A story today in US News and World Report discusses a study published in PLoS Medicine linking early exposure to lead to later criminality.

This reminded me of all the hidden dimensions of inequality and how they relate to school success and things like disproportionate Learning, Emotional and Behavioral Disability classifications.

That thought reminded me of this video from the Educator Roundtable.

More resources on lead exposure:

Lead Safe Wisconsin

“Goodbye Old Paint,” in Affordable Housing: A Crisis for Wisconsin’s Families (a publication of WisKids Count, a project of the Wisconsin Council on Families and Children).

Thomas J. Mertz

1 Comment

Filed under AMPS, Best Practices, education, Equity, Local News, National News, nclb, No Child Left Behind

Quote of the day

Map from the Wisconsin Atlas of School Finance, by Jack Norman, a publication of the Institute for Wisconsin’s Future.

“I have been on the school board for ten years and we have had to make cuts eight of those years. We are looking at the destruction of education in Northern Wisconsin. What I would like to see is the media saying it’s a problem,” said [Rhinelander School District] school board president Chuck Fitzgerald.

Quoted in the Rhinelander Daily News.

An April 2008 referendum in Rhinelander was defeated by about 3,000 votes. The last referendum to pass in the district was in 1998.

It isn’t just in Northern Wisconsin or Madison where our once great public schools are being destroyed, it is throughout the state. Let’s “Get-er Done” and fix the state school finance system.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under "education finance", AMPS, Budget, education, Equity, finance, Gimme Some Truth, Referenda, School Finance, We Are Not Alone

Teenage Kicks

Saturday, May 17th is our older son’s birthday. He turns 13, becomes a teenager. In honor of the occasion, here are a couple of videos.

Teenage Kicks, by the Raconteurs (he’s a big Jack White/White Stripes Fan).

Teenage Kicks, by the Undertones (I’m a big Undertones fan).

I know this strays from the topic of this blog, but I am sure the teen years will be educational for all of us.

Happy Birthday.

Thomas J. Mertz (Dad)

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Local News

A Message to Gov. Doyle (updated)

The Wisconsin Assembly joined the Senate last night in passing a budget repair bill. In the Assembly, the Madison delegation was split. Governor Doyle has promised swift action, including some vetoes. Some democrats are saying they will vote to override (some?, all?) vetoes.

The bill is not great for schools. One good thing is the measure closing the “Wal-Mart Loophole.” If we are going to move toward better school funding, fairer tax policies have to part of the answer. Not so great is shifting $125 million from state aids to local school taxes. This will make passing referenda more difficult.

Madison Superintendent Art Rainwater sent a message to Governor Doyle about another bad provision, this one further limits phase in funding for school districts wishing to start 4 year-old kindergarten programs.

May 15, 2008

Governor Jim Doyle
115 East – State Capitol
Madison, WI 53702

Dear Governor Doyle,

I am requesting that you use your partial veto powers to improve the unnecessarily restrictive 4-year old kindergarten language contained in the budget repair bill.

The provision allows for a 5-year phase-in of 4K programs only for school districts that are operating a 4K program during the 2007-08 school year. This language would only benefit a handful of school districts. Allowing all school districts to phase-in 4K programs would assist districts, such as Madison, in potentially moving forward with 4K programs and assist your laudable goal of expanded early childhood opportunities for our state’s children.

Madison Schools has worked with local child care providers to lay the groundwork for a 4K program, but is substantially stymied by funding problems. The inequity in K4 funding should be fixed in the 2009-2011 biennial budget. It is fundamentally wrong for a Milwaukee voucher school to be able to start a 4K program and September and receive the full state reimbursement by the following June – public schools should have the same opportunity.

Please veto the 4K language to allow all school districts the opportunity to phase in a 4K program over a 5-year period. Thank you for your steadfast support of K-12 public education.

Sincerely,

Art Rainwater
Superintendent

The consensus in Madison is growing that we need need to do this in the very near future. If this measure goes through, it will be nearly impossible.

If you believe that we should establish 4k, now is the time to join Superintendent Rainwater in contacting the Governor and our legislative delegation.

Update:

Doyle issued his veto message.  He did not go along with the legislature on the school aid payments, but he did OK the limit on 4K phase in funding.  This is not good news for the future of 4K in Madison and the state.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under "education finance", AMPS, Budget, education, finance, Local News, Referenda, School Finance, Take Action

Honoring Carol Carstensen

School Board’s Carstensen gets fond farewell

Samara Kalk Derby (Capital Times)— 5/15/2008 7:19 am

More than 100 friends, colleagues, family members and parents showed up at a farewell party Wednesday at Olbrich Gardens to say goodbye and thank you to Carol Carstensen, who served six terms on the Madison School Board and stepped down after the spring elections.

“There will never be another Carol Carstensen. I will predict that,” said School Board member Johnny Winston Jr. “There will never be another School Board member in this community that will serve 18 years. I miss her already.”

Winston called it a wonderful experience to work with Carstensen.

“She really not only knew the material and had a grasp of the issues going on, but she also had her pulse on the community as well,” he said.

Former board member Nan Brien, who served with Carstensen in the early 1990s, said that for 18 years Carstensen was the spokesperson on the board for all the kids in the district.

“She was particularly adamant that all kids, no matter their background, have an opportunity for the best education. That is the heart and soul of who Carol Carstensen is,” Brien said.

Carstensen always cared about the kids above anything else, she added. “That’s really why she fought all the budget battles and all the referendum battles — so the district would have the resources to give all the kids an equal opportunity,” Brien said.

The liberal Carstensen, who served four years as president of the seven-member board, aggravated conservatives by backing all 14 referendum questions during her tenure. Her critics viewed her as an advocate of higher school property taxes in Madison. Still, she never lost a School Board election.

Carstensen said she was delighted by the turnout at her party Wednesday. Old friends and new friends came out from the various areas of her life — the school district, her neighborhood, her book club, and the UW Law School, where her husband, Peter, is a professor.

She said she’s been ambivalent about stepping down.

“There are a lot of things I don’t miss and won’t miss at all, but there are other things — a number of things that have yet to be decided — that I will miss,” Carstensen said.

“The new superintendent will be working with the board in a new way, and I will miss that,” she said.

Well-wishers approached with their goodbyes: “Eighteen years is not nearly enough as far as I’m concerned,” one said. “Enjoy the freedom,” said another. “What are you going to do on Monday nights?” wondered a third.

Carstensen said she plans to do some volunteer work on the re-election campaign of Wisconsin Supreme Court Chief Justice Shirley Abrahamson and possibly the presidential campaign of Barack Obama.

David Cohen, a district parent, called Carstensen “one of the nicest, fairest School Board members that any parent would ever have to engage, and I’ve engaged with her a lot — good and bad.”

Many people at the gathering said they admired Carstensen’s dedication. “I do think that’s why she served as long as she did,” said Carole Trone, who has three children in the district.

“She believes in our schools. I think sometimes it was a thankless position with tough choices to make,” Trone added. “I think she symbolizes what makes this community strong — that we have people like her who are willing to give so many years of service.”

Mary Ellen LaChance, a district Reading Recovery teacher leader, called Carstensen a thoughtful decision-maker and someone who is willing to listen and learn about all the different facets of school programs.

“Obviously, the fact that she’s worked for so many years as a School Board member reflects her extreme dedication to education and Madison,” LaChance said.

Parent Jerry Eykholt called Carstensen an analytical thinker, who is strategic and effective.

“She’s just a fantastic community member, first and foremost. Everyone knows where her heart is — it’s really with the kids and how they are progressing. It’s hard not to join her.”

I had the pleasure of being part of this tribute to Carol. Not mentioned in the story is that the event was appropriately a fund raiser for the Foundation for Madison Public Schools. Here is a form to make a donation in Carol’s name.

It is difficult to give Carol Carstensen enough thanks for all the good she has done our schools and community. I think the best way is to follow her example and work to keep our schools strong; Volunteer in your school, serve on a district task force or committee, work to change the state school finance system, help with a referendum campaign

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, education, Local News, Referenda, Take Action

Board Member Budget Amendments Posted

The MMSD website just posted the proposed budget amendments of Board of Education members (and one from the administration). The Board will consider and vote on the budget on Monday, May 12. It looked like there might be some action (click for video) on class size and specials classes and some other things, but that didn’t happen.

Instead, just one amendment from the administration concerning what seems to be Fund 80 housecleaning on contributions to the Wisconsin Retirement system and the tax levy (anyone know if this is a new issue or how the retirement contributions were handled in prior years?); one from Beth Moss funding the replacement of 143 Windows 98 computers via a reduction in the reserve for contingency; and one from Marjorie Passman employing $60,000 of the Fund 80 levy (contingent on other funding?) to help continue the Madison Family Literacy/Even Start Literacy program at Lakeview/Northport. All seem reasonable to me. That’s it. Relative budget peace.

It is important to realize that this peace is the product of a one time distribution of excess Tax Incremental Finance District collections. Next year, we are back to dealing with the “going out of business” system of funding education in Wisconsin. Without a referendum, these are the budget projections (for Fund 10).

Lots of red ink ahead. Time to get to work on a referendum.

Thomas J. Mertz

1 Comment

Filed under "education finance", AMPS, Best Practices, Budget, education, finance, Referenda, School Finance, Uncategorized

Learning in and from the past

In an earlier post I mentioned that my students are working on a primary sources assignment. At least one student is writing about a document found in a recently posted digital history collection of material from Madison schools stretching from the 1880s to the mid 1970s. The project is a “cooperative effort between the Madison School & Community Education Library (MSCEL), the UW School of Education and the University of Wisconsin Digital Collections Center (UWDCC). ” It contains over 17,000 pages of material. I’ve only looked at 100 or so, but have found it fascinating.

Here are a couple of choice excerpts from Superintendent Phillip Falk’s 1949 Learning to Read in the Madison Public Schools.

Problems of Long Standing

One of the most common misunderstandings in recent years is the belief that a startling new technique of teaching reading is being used which lacks some of the sterling virtues of the old techniques. Usually the implication is that either the old “alphabet” method, which began with the a b c’s, or the phonic method, which emphasized the sounds of letters, is the logical way to teach beginning reading. Any change in procedure today is looked upon as the cause of every deficiency, from inability to read well orally to poor spelling.

Few adults can remember the method by which they learned to read. Records show that the a b c method was discarded in Madison as early as 1871. In his short report for that year Superintendent B. M. Reynolds stated, “During the year the teachers in the Primary grades have discarded the Alphabetic Method of teaching reading, and have adopted what is called the ‘Word-Method’.”

By 1889 the phonic method, too, was losing ground. In December of that year Isabella Lamont, a primary teacher in Madison’s Second Ward school, read a paper before the state teachers’ convention in which she stated, “In the teaching of reading (which is the key to every other study and is therefore of the first importance) there is the a b c method, the word method, the sentence method, and the phonic method. None of these methods is wrong, but all are incomplete … ” One may well ask how new is new,or how old is old.

And (describing the practices of 1949)

There is no one “best” method of teaching children to read. Almost every known method, technique, or device is utilized as needed – experience, phonetic, word, sentence, story, meaningful drill or practice – not in isolation, but in an approach to a particular problem of a particular group or of a particular child.

Makes sense to me.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Best Practices, education, Local News