Category Archives: Elections

We Are Not Alone #5

Part of a series of posts on school finance and referendums around the state.

Too many referendums and too much news to cover it all. Just a once over this time.

Shell Lake and Spooner have referenda questions on the ballot. The Shell Lake superintendent described the familiar situation:

Superintendent Jerry Gauderman said Shell Lake’s school expenses, as in other school districts, are rising at 4 percent a year while revenue is increasing at only 2 percent. And like many districts in Northern Wisconsin, Shell Lake has experienced a declining enrollment which affects the revenue limit based on student enrollment.

The Spooner business manager explained their situation

The money will be used, primarily, to keep existing programs in place, said school officials. They noted earlier this year that a casulty of a failed referendum may be the elimination of 20 positions, at least three-quarters of them teaching jobs.

Andrew Sarnow, district business manager, projects that without additional funding the district will experience deficits of $1.01 million in the 2007-08 school year; $1.62 million in 2008-09; $2.273 million in 2009-10; and $2.996 million, 2010-11.

The district plans to cut roughly $200,000 in both 2007-08 and 2008-09.
Along with the cuts, if the program maintenance referendum passes, the district will accrue a surplus in the first two years that will cover the larger deficits expected in 2009-10 and 2010-11.

Oconomowoc has a different problem. They are growing, but the rolling average employed to calculate the revenue caps hurts growing districts.

Barry said most of the districts that are struggling are districts with declining enrollment and therefore declining revenue, although their costs are somewhat fixed. In districts where enrollment is flat, so is the revenue.

“Yet their costs are going up; health insurance for example. That scenario should not be unfamiliar to anybody in Oconomowoc. This district struggled with flat and declining enrollment for 10 years, and it obviously weakened the district’s balance sheet substantially over that period,” Barry pointed out.

“As we look forward to next year, we have a different scenario. Unlike many of our neighboring districts, and unlike almost 70 percent of the districts in our state, Oconomowoc has increasing enrollment, and in our case we have rapidly increasing enrollment,” the assistant superintendent said.

Despite, or because of that advantage, a new circumstance arises that requires prudent planning.

“Our challenge is that the revenue formula, the three-year rolling average, by definition, lags behind your actual enrollment year to year.
“Therein lies the difficulty for us. Our revenue has not caught up to the size of the district and the size of the staff to support the district,” Barry said.

“The problem this year is can we, in the budget, earmark enough revenue for the additional staffing that we need? It’s a growth problem, not a cutting problem,” Barry said.

In Baraboo, school board candidates are talking referenda (and private financing)

The “R word” made an appearance in a question over whether the candidates would support a go at another referendum. All said they would. It’s perhaps surprising that an anti-referendum candidate didn’t surface when about half of the district’s voters opposed both attempts last year to increase its levy and there was organized opposition to the measure.

Maxwell, who ran on an anti-referendum platform three years ago, said his experience in the trenches of the district’s operations and finances have changed his perspective.
“I sat on this stage before and fought my personal demons on the word ‘referendum,'” he said. They’ve made the cuts the “no” votes forced upon them and became more efficient, Maxwell said.

“I see no options for this district based on the cuts we made in the past, the priorities we’ve set and the goals we want to achieve,” Vodak said. “I wish it didn’t have to come to that.”

Anderson said if the state’s school funding formula doesn’t change a referendum will be inevitable.

“We need to stop voting for state representatives that don’t listen to us and say take care of it at the community level,” Hovde said.

All candidates also agreed that cuts to the music program last year should be reinstated and that such a vital piece of the district’s educational offerings shouldn’t be left to private fund-raising.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Budget, Elections, Referenda, School Finance, We Are Not Alone

Observations, Endorsements

 

There has been much talk on the campaign trail about the need for a “cost benefit” analysis and the lack of forward planning. I find it disturbing that some of our candidates seem unaware of the 2002 Functional Analysis that MMSD commissioned from Virchow, Krause & Company, LLP. At that time, the district realized that the flawed state finance system would force cuts in the years ahead and wanted to be prepared. Because we have the analysis, we are prepared (nearly as well) as we can be for the challenges of the yearly budgeting.

I’m glad that this was commissioned and we have it to use. However, we all need to be careful and understand that all educational research and data is contingent, contextual and only provides guidance for decision-making. The factors that make a student achieve or fail are so complex and interactive that attributing causality is at best a matter of likelihood, not certainty. Some of the most important things, like the smile on a teacher’s face, defy quantification. Additionally, all the measures we use are to one degree or another subjective and flawed (see Fair Test for one set of examples). It isn’t science and applying the positivism of science and related reliance on “expertise” to education can be dangerous.

I value data and research as tools to inform educational policy, but I know that human judgment is the final and most important quality that we need on the Board of Education. This is one reason why I am supporting Beth Moss, Marjorie Passman and Johnny Winston Jr. in the April 3d Election. They are knowledgeable about our district and community, open to using data and research and have displayed the kind of judgement we need to keep our schools strong and getting stronger.

Thomas J. Mertz

2 Comments

Filed under AMPS, Best Practices, Budget, Elections, Local News

We Are Not Alone #4

I’m going to try to pull together some excerpts from local reports on April 3d school referenda in the next few days (for the next We Are Not Alone entry). This is just an overview of those measures from the DPI listing.

· Total Referenda = 72
· Total Districts = 53 (about 1/8 of the districts in the state)
· Total Issue Debt (mostly building and renovation) = 33
· Total Non Recurring (operating and maintenance) = 24
· Total Recurring (operating and maintenance) = 15
· Largest Operating = $21,601,931 (Eau Claire Area)

If recent trends continue, about half will pass. This is not a system that is working for the children of our state.

Thomas J. Mertz

1 Comment

Filed under AMPS, Elections, Referenda, School Finance, We Are Not Alone

Nan Youngerman on REACH

At the MUAE forum to discuss education for gifted and talented students, it was disturbing to hear one candidate, Maya Cole for Seat #5, talk about eliminating REACH as a way to trade money to keep Eastside schools open. I was bothered on many levels.

One; REACH was developed to provide one additional and desperately needed hour of planning time for elementary teachers. It is in this hour that teachers might differentiate curriculum or do hundreds of other necessary tasks to keep their classrooms going. This precious hour, one of about a total of five permitted during the work week, is a negotiated term or part of the Teacher Bargaining Agreement. Maya Cole is suggesting it be eliminated. If this were possible, simply by saying it —- is not a friendly gesture to teachers. This will not save money. A different method of providing for children during the negotiated hour of planning time would need to be developed. Claiming to know what would help teachers and then suggesting to take away their planning time is down right nasty. Elementary planning time is beyond necessary for teacher sanity and is is the very basic component of being a thoughtful and reflective teacher!

On a second level, this was a disturbing suggestion made at a forum where the main topic was gifted and talented education. The original intent of REACH, when developed in the early nineties, was to promote curiosity, creativity, problem solving, cooperative learning and about six other similar criteria. In many instances these key aspects of REACH have been lost, but I rather hear about returning to these ideals to promote the giftedness in every child than hear about eliminating the program entirely at a forum of this nature.

Respectfully submitted, Nan Youngerman

Veteran teacher, parent, Madison community member, member of Teacher Bargaining Committee, 1990 committee for Elementary Planning, 1990 Committee to Design REACH Program and WI Presidential Teacher of Excellence

I took the liberty of uploading one of Ms Youngerman’s publications (linked to her name) so all can see what teachers who are given the time and tools can accomplish.

Thomas J. Mertz

5 Comments

Filed under AMPS, Best Practices, Elections, Local News

MUAE Forum Video-Maya Cole’s response

Question: Would you as a school board member support a referendum to deal with the short fall that the district is currently facing? For example, Carol Carstensen’s version of a referendum.

Maya Cole’s response to referendum question (REACH)

Posted by: Janet Morrow

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Budget, Elections

School Board Election Update Information

Election Day is April 3. Madison has a mayor’s race, several city council races and three city-wide Board of Education races. In the next two weeks, there will be a multitude of candidate forums for the public to learn first-hand what each candidate is all about. Please see the calendar section of madisonamps.org for details on upcoming forums.

And remember, Election Day is during spring break. madisonamps.org has detailed information on absentee voting in its elections section. March 29 is the last day you can request an absentee ballot. Any ballot not received by April 3 will not be counted.

Beth Swedeen

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Elections, Local News

If You Care, Help

If you care who is elected to the Madison School Board on April 3d, then help the candidate(s) of your choice.

All the candidate’s web pages (linked here) have places where you can sign on. Not everyone can afford large donations, but everyone who cares should be able to find an hour or two to help shape the future of our district. The election is only a little over two weeks away. Now is the time.

Thomas J. Mertz

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Elections, Local News, Take Action

Bert Zipperer: Remember voters, as schools go, so goes our city

From the Capitol Times

By Bert Zipperer
March 14, 2007

A referendum question will again be on next month’s ballot seeking our approval to continue dismantling public education, both in Madison and throughout the state. You will be able to vote to overcrowd classrooms, close schools, provide fewer support staff and undermine all sorts of quality educational programs in our district.

While this question isn’t explicitly on the ballot, by voting for candidates who have failed to put forth efforts to counteract the established state spending caps for school districts (as well as cities), we are certainly voting to destroy public education for all.

Local candidates will typically offer some comment such as “I can’t do anything about that, as we can’t determine taxation powers or policies at our level of government.” These people are the strongest allies of the forces that would end public education as we have known it. They must be voted out of office or they will harm future generations.

What must be done? First of all, every level of government in this state deserves to be a real democracy. Each level of government knows the needs of its people and the elected leaders must be empowered to raise whatever level of funding they deem appropriate. At this time both schools and cities are handcuffed by spending caps. They determine their spending priorities within the limits imposed by the state government.

If local control means anything, state leaders must lift the caps now. Let us decide our own budgets, and if local leaders are wrong, we will throw them out ourselves.

If spending caps are not eliminated, then I believe each and every candidate for any state office must have spending caps imposed on campaign spending. If you can’t run a campaign within spending limits, why do they think we can educate children on the cheap?

Every elected leader in this city and across the state must take action to bring a system of fair taxation to all levels of government. This would be based on an individual’s and a family’s ability to pay. Those of us with more resources would pay a higher proportion of our wealth in taxes, as we have more disposable income. Of course, this is based on the progressive income tax, first enacted here in Wisconsin a century ago.

City leaders and the Madison Metropolitan School District can take immediate steps by authorizing studies of the effects of various tax systems, including local and county income taxes, indexing property taxes on primary residences to household income, and other ideas.

How do we ensure that we provide high-quality services to all without crushing lower-income families, working class families and seniors on fixed incomes? We must demand action from local leaders to move this statewide issue forward.

Immediately the city’s elected leaders must join with the School Board and put forth two referendum questions:

1.Exempt local schools from spending caps, either permanently or for the next several years.

2.Demand state action to create fair taxation options, based on the ability to pay, to fund all local levels of government.

We must replace spending caps with fair taxation at every level of government. We must come to see that the monies we spend are not “costs” to be cut, but rather “investments” that will pay a dividend over the coming decades. By cutting investments, we are eliminating any future returns on this money.

We must demand that local officials lead, rather than be passive puppets, in this time of crisis. Neighborhood residents in various parts of Madison are now pitted against each other to keep schools open and to save specific school programs. The decisions to cut the school budget are not based on fewer students, less need or any good educational reasoning. The district simply creates a budget within the state-imposed spending caps.

The “tax cut” chorus has been based on lies – while taxes are high for some, they are high because of the elimination of taxes on the wealthy and on big businesses.

While we are at it, why not demand a constitutional amendment to fully fund all campaigns with public money? If all elected leaders were responsive to the people, and not to the biggest money donors, wouldn’t this democracy be dramatically reinvigorated immediately? Currently money alone is fully represented – imagine if people had that kind of representation!

The city and the schools are tied together in a fabric of mutual destiny. As the schools go, so goes the city, and vice versa. It is time for these levels of government to stand up together and take action.

We, as voters and members of this community, must not support any candidate for any office who does NOT take action to restore democracy and ensure a fair taxation system to invest in our community. To do anything else is to truly vote to continue destroying public education as well as our city’s future.

Posted by Janet Morrow

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Budget, Elections, Local News, School Finance

Beth Moss discusses the district’s budget dilemma

School Board candidate Beth Moss appeared on WORT this morning to discuss the difficult budgeting issues facing the district due to the state’s QEO/Budget Cap squeeze. Tony Castañeda was the interviewer and you can hear it here.

Robert Godfrey

3 Comments

Filed under AMPS, Budget, Elections, Local News

Absentee Voting

Since the Spring Election takes place during the MMSD Spring Break when many of us will be out of town, registered voters can request that an absentee ballot be mailed to them by completing this form and mailing the form to the City Clerk’s Office.

You can also vote in person at the City Clerk’s Office — Room 103 of the City-County Building downtown. If city residents are not already registered to vote at their current address, they can register and vote with a single trip to the City Clerk’s Office.

Robert Godfrey

Leave a comment

Filed under AMPS, Elections